Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Versus Aspirin in Relation to Vascular Risk in the COMPASS Trial

Sonia S Anand1, John W Eikelboom1, Leanne Dyal2

  • 1Department of Medicine, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Insights

Low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin significantly reduced vascular events in stable vascular disease patients. Risk stratification identified higher-risk individuals, optimizing treatment benefits for preventing recurrent events.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Vascular Medicine
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • The COMPASS trial demonstrated that combining low-dose rivaroxaban with aspirin effectively reduces major vascular events in patients with stable vascular disease.
  • Identifying specific patient subsets at higher risk for recurrent vascular events is crucial for optimizing antithrombotic therapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify patient subgroups at increased risk of recurrent vascular events within the COMPASS trial cohort.
  • To guide the focused application of rivaroxaban and aspirin therapy based on individual patient risk profiles.

Main Methods:

  • Risk stratification of COMPASS patients with vascular disease using the REACH (REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) score and CART (Classification and Regression Tree) analysis.
  • Comparison of rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin alone over 30 months, assessing composite vascular events, severe bleeding, and net clinical benefit.

Main Results:

  • Rivaroxaban and aspirin combination reduced serious vascular events by 25% (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85), preventing 23 events per 1,000 patients over 30 months.
  • A non-significant 34% increase in severe bleeding was observed (IRR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.95-1.88), representing 2 additional events per 1,000 patients.
  • In high-risk patients (≥1 high-risk feature by CART analysis), rivaroxaban and aspirin prevented 33 serious vascular events, compared to 10 events per 1,000 in lower-risk patients.

Conclusions:

  • Risk stratification, using criteria such as ≥2 vascular beds affected, heart failure, renal insufficiency, or diabetes, can identify higher-risk patients with vascular disease.
  • The net clinical benefit of rivaroxaban and aspirin remains favorable for the majority of patients compared to aspirin monotherapy.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.0K
Compass01:23

Compass

The compass is a fundamental instrument that operates by aligning its magnetic needle with Earth's magnetic field. This alignment facilitates navigation and orientation, offering a means to determine direction relative to magnetic north. However, the magnetic needle points to magnetic north, which differs slightly from true geographic north due to magnetic declination, which is the angular deviation between these two points. Declination varies based on geographic location and shifts over time...
6.3K
Seedless Vascular Plants03:24

Seedless Vascular Plants

Seedless Vascular Plants Were the First Tall Plants on Earth
66.7K
Design Example: Marking Boundaries of a Site Using a Compass01:12

Design Example: Marking Boundaries of a Site Using a Compass

Marking site boundaries using a compass is a precise surveying technique that ensures the accuracy of boundary delineation. The process begins by using provided site details, including the bearings and lengths of each boundary line. The initial step involves calculating latitudes and departures for all sides of the site. This computation verifies that the traverse is free of errors, ensuring a closed and accurate boundary.The process starts at a known point, such as Point A, which is often...
286
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.2K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.6K