Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers
Jiayun Chen1, Xingsong Li1, Hongbin Zhong1
1School of Biology and Biological Engineering & Department of Biomedical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
This study compared next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms and variant calling pipelines for genomic analysis. Strelka2 demonstrated superior accuracy and efficiency, offering guidance for reliable variant identification in research and diagnostics.
Area of Science:
- Genomics and Bioinformatics
- Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Technologies
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and its analysis tools are crucial for scientific research and clinical diagnostics.
- A systematic comparison of NGS platforms and variant calling pipelines is needed to guide genomic applications.
- Evaluating performance, concordance, and efficiency is essential for reliable variant identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance, concordance, and operating efficiency of 27 combinations of sequencing platforms and variant calling pipelines.
- To assess variant calling accuracy for Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Insertions/Deletions (INDELs) across different platforms and pipelines.
- To evaluate the impact of sequencing coverage on variant calling efficiency and identify optimal pipelines.
Main Methods:
- Compared three variant calling pipelines (Genome Analysis Tool Kit HaplotypeCaller, Strelka2, Samtools-Varscan2) across nine datasets for the NA12878 genome.
- Utilized BGISEQ500, MGISEQ2000, HiSeq4000, NovaSeq, and HiSeq Xten sequencing platforms.
- Down-sampled Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) datasets to assess performance at varying coverage levels.
Main Results:
- All combinations showed good SNP calling performance (F-scores > 0.96 for WES, > 0.975 for WGS).
- INDEL calling performance varied (0.75-0.91 for WES, 0.71-0.93 for WGS), with high overall concordance.
- Strelka2 exhibited superior detection accuracy and processing efficiency on both BGI and Illumina platforms, especially at lower coverages.
Conclusions:
- The study provides comprehensive guidelines for reliable and consistent variant identification using NGS technologies.
- Strelka2 is recommended for promotion and application due to its high accuracy and efficiency.
- Understanding platform and pipeline performance is critical for optimizing NGS-based genomic research and clinical diagnostics.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Histone Variants at the Centromere
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Crossing Over
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
Cross-Sectional Research
Monohybrid Crosses

