Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Effects of Exposure of Formaldehyde to a Rat Model of Atopic Dermatitis Induced by Neonatal Capsaicin Treatment
Published on: September 27, 2017
Patient and physician preferences for atopic dermatitis injection treatments in Japan
Yukari Okubo1, Kerrie-Anne Ho2, Simon Fifer2
1Department of Dermatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Background: Recently, biologic agents administered as a subcutaneous injection have been introduced as treatment options for atopic dermatitis (AD). Biologic treatments differ considerably from traditional topical and systemic anti-inflammatory treatments, and it is unclear how this may impact patient and physician preferences for treatments.Objective: To examine the treatment preferences for new injection treatments of patients and physicians.Methods: Discrete choice experiment methodology was used to quantify preferences for treatments via an online survey. Participants were presented with a series of choice scenarios; treatment options were described using the following attributes: add-on or replacement treatment, efficacy of improving rashes and itching, time until response, place of administration, injection site reaction, risk of mild-to-moderate and severe side effects, frequency of administration and cost.Results: 76.67% of physicians and 46.24% of patients opted-in to the new treatment in the scenarios presented. Of those who opted-in to treatment, physicians were more likely to value the efficacy of treating rashes and were more concerned about cost than patients. Patients preferred add-on treatments and were against self-administering the treatment at home.Conclusion: Overall patients and physicians differ in their preferences for AD treatments. These findings have implications for shared decision making and clinical practice.
Background: Recently, biologic agents administered as a subcutaneous injection have been introduced as treatment options for atopic dermatitis (AD). Biologic treatments differ considerably from traditional topical and systemic anti-inflammatory treatments, and it is unclear how this may impact patient and physician preferences for treatments.Objective: To examine the treatment preferences for new injection treatments of patients and physicians.Methods: Discrete choice experiment methodology was used to quantify preferences for treatments via an online survey. Participants were presented with a series of choice scenarios; treatment options were described using the following attributes: add-on or replacement treatment, efficacy of improving rashes and itching, time until response, place of administration, injection site reaction, risk of mild-to-moderate and severe side effects, frequency of administration and cost.Results: 76.67% of physicians and 46.24% of patients opted-in to the new treatment in the scenarios presented. Of those who opted-in to treatment, physicians were more likely to value the efficacy of treating rashes and were more concerned about cost than patients. Patients preferred add-on treatments and were against self-administering the treatment at home.Conclusion: Overall patients and physicians differ in their preferences for AD treatments. These findings have implications for shared decision making and clinical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
Parkinson's Disease: Treatment
Parkinson's Disease is primarily a result of the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The cornerstone of...
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Patient-centered Care

