Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
Published on: February 22, 2019
Evaluation of Protective Efficacy When Combining Turkey Herpesvirus-Vector Vaccines
John R Dunn1, Kiril M Dimitrov2, Patti J Miller2
1USDA, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, MI 48823, john.dunn@ars.usda.gov.
Abstract:
Turkey herpesvirus (HVT) is widely used as a vaccine against Marek's disease in chickens and recently as a vector for foreign genes from infectious bursal disease virus, Newcastle disease (ND) virus, infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) virus, and avian influenza virus. Advantages of HVT-vector vaccines are that the vaccines do not contain live respiratory viruses or live infectious bursal disease virus able to replicate and cause disease or embryo mortality, they can be administered at hatch or in ovo, and they are relatively insensitive to interference from maternally derived antibodies. As producers have tried to combine HVT-vector vaccines to protect against additional diseases, reports have indicated that applying two vectored vaccines using the same HVT vector is reported to reduce the efficacy of one or both vaccines. To confirm this interference, we evaluated commercial vaccines from multiple companies, including products with inserts designed to protect against ND, infectious ILT, and infectious bursal disease (IBD). Using a standard dosage, we found that the ILT product was most severely affected by the addition of other vaccines, as demonstrated by a significant increase in clinical signs, significant decrease in weight gain, and increase in quantity of challenge virus observed from tracheal swabs collected from Days 3-5 postchallenge. The ND and IBD products were also affected by the addition of other vaccines, although in most cases differences compared to vaccination with the vector alone were not statistically significant. This study demonstrates the importance of following manufacturer guidelines and the need for validating alternative strategies to benefit from the high level of protection offered by vector vaccines.
More Related Videos
06:26Author Spotlight: Optimizing CFU Determination for Efficient Assessment of TB Vaccine Efficacy and Antigen Presentation Analysis
Published on: July 28, 2023
06:32Protective Efficacy and Pulmonary Immune Response Following Subcutaneous and Intranasal BCG Administration in Mice
Published on: September 19, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Self-Efficacy
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Zones of Protection
Protective zones are defined by closed dashed lines, containing one or more components. A key characteristic of these zones is the strategic placement of...
Protection of Alcohols
Protection
It defines a protecting group as the masking agent to make the more reactive species inert to a given set of conditions. This concept is depicted via the illustration of liquid flow through different outlets in an assembly of pipes. The analogy helps to understand the role...
Protecting Self-Esteem