Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
A Mixed-Methods Approach to Evaluating the Internal Validity of the Reactive Strength Index
Talin Louder1,2, Brennan J Thompson3, Nile Banks4
1Division of Kinesiology and Sport Management, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA. talinlouder@yahoo.com.
The reactive strength index (RSI) is often calculated using assumptions that may affect validity. A mixed-methods approach offers a more accurate assessment of muscle-tendon complex reactive capacity than the conventional method.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human Movement Science
- Sports Science
Background:
- The reactive strength index (RSI) is a key metric for assessing muscle-tendon complex reactive capacity.
- Conventional RSI calculation relies on assumptions about linear mechanics and jump height estimation, potentially impacting validity.
- Previous research suggests a mixed-methods approach may provide a more accurate RSI estimation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the internal validity of RSI scores computed using conventional and mixed-methods approaches.
- To examine the impact of different drop heights on RSI calculations.
- To compare estimated impact velocities with theoretical values.
Main Methods:
- Seventy physically active young adults performed depth jumps from three different heights (0.51, 0.66, 0.81 m).
- RSI was calculated using both a conventional method and a mixed-methods approach incorporating 2D videography, body segment parameters, and force platform data.
- Statistical analyses included linear regression, ANOVA, and one-sample t-tests to compare the methods and assess impact velocities.
Main Results:
- No significant main effects or interactions were found between computational approaches in the ANOVA (p = 0.467–0.938).
- Linear regression showed moderately strong associations (R² = 0.685–0.741) between the conventional and mixed-methods RSI scores.
- The conventional method tended to overestimate RSI for scores below 1.0 and underestimate for scores above 1.0, with estimated impact velocities up to 13% lower than theoretical (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Researchers with access to motion capture and force platforms should consider the mixed-methods approach for enhanced RSI validity.
- Practitioners should exercise caution when comparing conventional RSI scores across individuals due to potential over/underestimation.
- The findings highlight the importance of computational methodology in accurately assessing reactive strength.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Internal Energy
Reliability and Validity
Acid Strength and Molecular Structure
In the absence of any leveling effect, the acid strength of binary compounds of hydrogen with nonmetals (A) increases as the H-A bond strength decreases down a group in the periodic table. For group 17, the order of increasing acidity is HF < HCl < HBr < HI. Likewise, for group 16, the order of increasing acid strength is H2O < H2S < H2Se < H2Te. Across a row in the periodic table, the acid strength of binary hydrogen compounds increases with increasing...
Internal Receptors
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
Relation Between Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength of Concrete

