Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice
Jean-David Werthel1,2, Gilles Walch3, Emilie Vegehan4
1Hôpital Ambroise Paré, 9 avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. jdwerthel@gmail.com.
This study clarifies reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) lateralization, revealing significant variability among implants. Understanding this variability helps surgeons choose appropriate RSA designs and surgical techniques for optimal patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Implant Design
Background:
- The concept of lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) lacks a clear, standardized definition.
- Existing RSA implants exhibit varied degrees of lateralization on the glenoid, humeral, or both sides.
- This ambiguity complicates the selection and application of RSA devices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a precise definition for lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
- To quantify the lateralization provided by commonly utilized RSA implant designs.
- To categorize implants based on their degree of global lateral offset.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 28 configurations from 22 distinct RSA implants using digitized templates.
- Measurement of glenoid, humeral, and global lateralization, normalized to a reference implant (Delta III).
- Classification of implants into defined categories based on glenoid (medialized/lateralized) and humeral (medialized/minimally lateralized/lateralized) components, and global offset increments.
Main Results:
- Global lateral offset varied significantly across analyzed RSA designs, ranging from 13.1 mm to 35.8 mm.
- Implants were categorized into five groups based on global lateral offset: medialized RSA (M-RSA), minimally lateralized RSA (ML-RSA), lateralized RSA (L-RSA), highly lateralized RSA (HL-RSA), and very highly lateralized RSA (VHL-RSA).
- Specific counts for each category were provided (e.g., five M-RSA, six HL-RSA).
Conclusions:
- A substantial heterogeneity exists in the lateralization achieved by current RSA implants on the market.
- This quantitative analysis provides a framework for understanding implant lateralization features.
- Surgeons can utilize this information to tailor surgical techniques based on the specific lateral offset characteristics of the chosen RSA implant.
Related Concept Videos
Muscles of the Shoulder
Anterior Thoracic Muscles
The anterior thoracic muscles include the serratus anterior, subclavius, and...
Mesh Analysis with Current Sources
Current Source in One Mesh: The analysis process is straightforward when a current source is found in only one mesh within the circuit. Mesh currents are assigned as usual, with the mesh containing the current source excluded from the analysis. Kirchhoff's voltage law...
Pleural Disorders: Types and Brief Description
Eulerian and Lagrangian Flow Descriptions
The Eulerian method focuses on fixed points in space where fluid properties, such as velocity, pressure, and temperature, are observed as the fluid moves between these...
Lateralization
Electrical Current

