Assessing the relevance of carbapenem prescriptions by an antibiotic stewardship team

To assess the level and factors of compliance of carbapenem prescriptions with guidelines and to determine the impact of an antibiotic stewardship team in a university hospital.

Five-month prospective study in the intensive care, surgery, and medicine units to measure the compliance of carbapenem prescriptions with guidelines from French scientific societies; compliance was assessed by an infectious disease specialist warned by the pharmacy, and the prescribers' compliance with the infectious disease specialist's advice was then assessed.

One hundred and four treatment initiations for 94 patients were included. Prescriptions were mostly empirical (64%), for pulmonary (35%), urinary tract (23%), and intra-abdominal (17%) infections. Prescriptions were mostly made in an intensive care unit (50%), by a junior physician (66%), with the use of imipenem (74%), and were followed by an objective reassessment (80%). Compliance with guidelines (82%) was significantly higher for empirical than documented prescriptions (91% vs 65%, P<0.001). Compliance was higher in intensive care units than medicine units (87% vs 61%, P=0.037). No change in the compliance rate was observed during the study. Compliance with the infectious disease specialist's advice (68%) improved, although not significantly (P=0.066).

Because of a higher than expected compliance of carbapenem prescriptions with guidelines and a lower than expected inclusions in the study, we did not show any impact. The diffusion of guidelines and long-term control of carbapenem prescriptions seem to be possible and necessary in hospitals to limit their ecological impact.