Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

An Anatomical Study of Nerves at Risk During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery
Published on: February 17, 2018
Which Patients Are Candidates for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery? - Establishment of Risk Calculators Using
Hiroyuki Nishi1, Hiroaki Miyata2, Noboru Motomura2
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital.
Background:
Although minimally invasive mitral valve surgery via a right minithoracotomy (MICS-mitral) is widely performed, no tool to evaluate its risk has been reported. We sought to establish MICS-mitral risk calculators using a national clinical database for selection of appropriate patients.
Methods And Results:
Between 2008 and 2015, 3,240 patients (mean age 59±14 years, males 1,950) underwent a MICS-mitral procedure in Japan and were registered in a national clinical database. We examined mortality and composite outcome (operative mortality, stroke, reoperation for bleeding) using multivariate analysis, then developed a risk calculator for each using stepwise analysis. Operative mortality was 1.1% and the composite outcome rate was 5%. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for operative mortality were shown to be age, respiratory dysfunction, thoracic aortic disease, myocardial infarction, body mass index >30, NYHA class IV, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, mitral valve replacement, multiple valve surgery, and annual cases <10. ROC curve analysis of our prediction formulas for mortality and composite outcome revealed an area under the curve for operative mortality of 0.877 (95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.94, P<0.01) and for composite outcome of 0.665 (95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.71, P<0.01).
Conclusions:
We developed risk calculator formulas using risk factors associated with both operative mortality and composite outcome. The present risk calculator formula is useful for patient selection and may influence future applications for this procedure.
Insights
This study developed risk calculators for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MICS-mitral) using a national database. These tools aid in selecting appropriate patients for MICS-mitral procedures, improving outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
- Surgical Risk Assessment
Background:
- Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MICS-mitral) is common but lacks established risk evaluation tools.
- Patient selection for MICS-mitral can be challenging without validated risk calculators.
- A need exists for tools to predict outcomes in MICS-mitral procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish risk calculators for MICS-mitral procedures.
- To identify key risk factors for operative mortality and composite outcomes.
- To facilitate appropriate patient selection for MICS-mitral surgery.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a Japanese national clinical database of 3,240 MICS-mitral patients (2008-2015).
- Performed multivariate and stepwise analyses to identify risk factors for mortality and composite outcomes.
- Developed and validated risk prediction formulas using ROC curve analysis.
Main Results:
- Operative mortality was 1.1%; composite outcome rate (mortality, stroke, reoperation) was 5%.
- Identified risk factors including age, respiratory dysfunction, BMI >30, NYHA class IV, and prior myocardial infarction.
- Achieved high predictive accuracy for operative mortality (AUC 0.877) and moderate accuracy for composite outcome (AUC 0.665).
Conclusions:
- Developed novel risk calculator formulas for MICS-mitral surgery.
- These calculators are valuable for patient selection and may guide future procedural applications.
- Risk stratification can optimize outcomes for patients undergoing MICS-mitral procedures.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
07:42An Image Guided Transapical Mitral Valve Leaflet Puncture Model of Controlled Volume Overload from Mitral Regurgitation in the Rat
Published on: May 19, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
National Nursing Organizations I