Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.5K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.5K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

10.2K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
10.2K
Initiation of Translation02:33

Initiation of Translation

38.4K
Initiating translation is complex because it involves multiple molecules. Initiator tRNA, ribosomal subunits, and eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) are all required to assemble on the initiation codon of mRNA. This process consists of several steps that are mediated by different eIFs.
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
38.4K
Initiation of Translation02:33

Initiation of Translation

8.0K
8.0K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.3K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.3K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

9.4K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
9.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying the Barriers and Facilitators to Clinical Implementation of Risk Prediction Tools for Dementia Across UK Primary Care: A Stakeholder Interview Study.

Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology·2026
Same author

Association of oral contraceptives with depression symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment in healthy women: A meta-analysis.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
Same author

Using Statistical Process Control through the Making Data Count approach to visualise data in NHS Trusts: a mixed-methods study.

BMJ leader·2026
Same author

Understanding Behavioral Influences on Eating Disorders and App Engagement to Inform Eating Disorder App Development: Qualitative Online Focus Groups With Adults With Lived Experience.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Why health services should use generic PROMs and PREMs.

BMJ open quality·2025
Same author

Measuring health confidence: benefits to patients, clinicians and healthcare providers.

BMJ open quality·2025
Same journal

Implementation of a nurse-led visit and follow-up for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: a quality improvement project.

BMJ open quality·2026
Same journal

Closing the gap in postoperative delirium detection: addressing low screening rates in the surgical recovery room.

BMJ open quality·2026
Same journal

Patient-centred approach to improve colorectal cancer screening (CRC) in resource-limited communities.

BMJ open quality·2026
Same journal

Australian and New Zealand nurses' understanding and application of aseptic technique in clinical contexts: a cross-sectional mixed-method study.

BMJ open quality·2026
Same journal

Using AI to identify in-hospital falls: a comparative analysis with incident reports and manual chart review.

BMJ open quality·2026
Same journal

Value operating system: a practical framework to measure outcomes-per-cost at the episode level.

BMJ open quality·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.1K

Development and initial testing of a Health Confidence Score (HCS).

Tim Benson1,2, Henry W W Potts2, Pippa Bark2

  • 1R-Outcomes Ltd, Thatcham, UK.

BMJ Open Quality
|July 2, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The new Health Confidence Score (HCS) is a validated, easy-to-use tool to measure patient self-care confidence. This short survey improves health outcomes and clinical support by assessing patient empowerment.

Keywords:
attitudeshealthcare quality improvementpatient-centred carequality measurementsurveys

More Related Videos

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

13.5K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.1K
Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

13.5K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Health psychology
  • Patient empowerment
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Patient confidence in managing their own health is crucial for improving outcomes and clinical support.
  • Existing tools to measure self-care health confidence are limited.
  • A need exists for a short, generic survey instrument for evaluation and quality improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a short, generic survey instrument to measure patient self-care health confidence.
  • To assess the psychometric properties and construct validity of the Health Confidence Score (HCS).

Main Methods:

  • The Health Confidence Score (HCS) was developed using literature review and focus groups.
  • Two surveys were conducted: study 1 (n=1031) for initial assessment and study 2 (n=378) for validation.
  • Construct and concurrent validity were tested by correlating HCS scores with the My Health Confidence (MHC) scale, health status, and demographics.

Main Results:

  • The HCS is a brief (50 words) survey with good readability (reading age 8).
  • It demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82) and construct validity, correlating highly with MHC (Spearman r = 0.76).
  • The HCS score was associated with health status and negatively with medication count and age, indicating good concurrent validity.

Conclusions:

  • The Health Confidence Score (HCS) is a short, user-friendly instrument with robust psychometric properties and construct validity.
  • It effectively measures patient self-care health confidence, providing both individual item insights and a comprehensive summary score.
  • The HCS is suitable for use in evaluation and quality improvement initiatives to enhance patient outcomes and clinical support.