Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Detection of Ligand-activated G Protein-coupled Receptor Internalization by Confocal Microscopy
Published on: April 9, 2017
Random Forest Refinement of Pairwise Potentials for Protein-Ligand Decoy Detection
Jun Pei1, Zheng Zheng1, Hyunji Kim1
1Department of Chemistry , Michigan State University , 578 South Shaw Lane , East Lansing , Michigan 48824 , United States.
Abstract:
An accurate scoring function is expected to correctly select the most stable structure from a set of pose candidates. One can hypothesize that a scoring function's ability to identify the most stable structure might be improved by emphasizing the most relevant atom pairwise interactions. However, it is hard to evaluate the relevant importance for each atom pair using traditional means. With the introduction of machine learning (ML) methods, it has become possible to determine the relative importance for each atom pair present in a scoring function. In this work, we use the Random Forest (RF) method to refine a pair potential developed by our laboratory (GARF; Zhang , Z. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018 , 14 , 5045 ) by identifying relevant atom pairs that optimize the performance of the potential on our given task. Our goal is to construct a ML model that can accurately differentiate the native ligand binding pose from candidate poses using a potential refined by RF optimization. We successfully constructed RF models on an unbalanced data set with the "comparison" concept, and the resultant RF models were tested on CASF-2013 ( Li , Y. J. Chem. Inf.Model. 2014 , 54 , 1700 ). In a comparison of the performance of our RF models against 29 scoring functions, we found that our models outperformed the other scoring functions in predicting the native pose. In addition, we created two artificially designed potential function sets to address the importance of the GARF potential in the RF models: (1) a scrambled probability function set, which was obtained by mixing up atom pairs and probability functions in GARF, and (2) a uniform probability function set, which shares the same peak positions with GARF but has fixed peak heights. The results of accuracy comparison from RF models based on the scrambled, uniform, and original GARF potential clearly showed that the peak positions in the GARF potential are important while the well depths are not. All code and data used in this work are available at https://github.com/JunPei000/random_forest_protein_ligand_decoy_detection .
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Random Error
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...

