Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test
Published on: August 17, 2018
Validation of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory Observational (CMAI-O) tool - ERRATUM
Abstract:
The above article (Griffiths et al., 2019) published with an incorrect abstract.The correct abstract is as follows.
Objectives:
Behaviours associated with agitation are common in people living with dementia. The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a 29-item scale widely used to assess agitation completed by a proxy (family carer or staff member). However, proxy informants introduce possible reporting bias when blinding to the treatment arm is not possible, and potential accuracy issues due to irregular contact between the proxy and the person with dementia over the reporting period. An observational measure completed by a blinded researcher may address these issues, but no agitation measures with comparable items exist.
Design:
Development and validation of an observational version of the CMAI (CMAI-O), to assess its validity as an alternative or complementary measure of agitation.
Setting:
Fifty care homes in England.
Participants:
Residents (N = 726) with dementia.
Measurements:
Two observational measures (CMAI-O and PAS) were completed by an independent researcher. Measures of agitation, functional status, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were completed with staff proxies.
Results:
The CMAI-O showed adequate internal consistency (α = .61), criterion validity with the PAS (r = .79, p = < .001), incremental validity in predicting quality of life beyond the Functional Assessment Staging of Alzheimer's disease (β = 1.83, p < .001 at baseline) and discriminant validity from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Apathy subscale (r = .004, p = .902).
Conclusions:
The CMAI-O is a promising research tool for independently measuring agitation in people with dementia in care homes. Its use alongside the CMAI could provide a more robust understanding of agitation amongst residents with dementia.
Insights
A new observational tool, the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Observational (CMAI-O), accurately measures agitation in people with dementia. This validated instrument offers a reliable alternative to proxy-reported scales, enhancing research in care homes.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Agitation is a common behavior in individuals with dementia.
- The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a widely used proxy-reported scale.
- Proxy reporting may introduce bias and accuracy issues in agitation assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an observational version of the CMAI (CMAI-O).
- To assess the validity of CMAI-O as an alternative or complementary measure of agitation.
- To address limitations of proxy-reported agitation measures in dementia research.
Main Methods:
- Development and validation of the CMAI-O.
- Observational measures (CMAI-O and PAS) completed by independent researchers.
- Data collected from 726 residents with dementia across 50 care homes in England.
Main Results:
- CMAI-O demonstrated adequate internal consistency (α = .61).
- Strong criterion validity with the PAS (r = .79, p < .001).
- Showed incremental and discriminant validity in predicting quality of life and differentiating from apathy.
Conclusions:
- The CMAI-O is a promising research tool for independent agitation measurement in dementia.
- It can be used alongside the CMAI for a more robust understanding of agitation.
- Facilitates objective assessment of agitation in care home residents.
More Related Videos
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Naturalistic Observations
Reliability and Validity
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Actor-Observer Effect