Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.1K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.1K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.6K
3.6K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

100.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
100.3K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

14.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
14.5K
Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

1.1K
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
1.1K
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

8.2K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
8.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What will be the future of computational biology for macromolecules in the era of AI?

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

CryoFSL: an annotation-efficient, few-shot learning framework for robust protein particle picking in cryo-electron microscopy micrographs.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Integrating protein and DNA embeddings for improving genome-wide transcription factor binding site prediction.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Evaluating generalization in protein-ligand cofolding methods.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same author

Improving AlphaFold3 by Engineering MSA and Template Inputs.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

934

Estimation of model accuracy in CASP13.

Jianlin Cheng1, Myong-Ho Choe2, Arne Elofsson3

  • 1Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

Proteins
|July 3, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Estimation of model accuracy (EMA) methods show progress in protein modeling, with deep learning improving predictions. The best EMA approaches now outperform servers in selecting accurate protein models.

More Related Videos

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.9K
Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations
12:09

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations

Published on: January 8, 2013

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

934
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.9K
Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations
12:09

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations

Published on: January 8, 2013

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Structural bioinformatics
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of 3D protein model accuracy is crucial for protein folding pipelines and selecting optimal models.
  • Progress in this field is vital for advancing structural biology and drug discovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the advancements in estimation of model accuracy (EMA) methods from CASP12 to CASP13.
  • To compare the performance of top EMA methods against protein modeling servers.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of successful estimation of model accuracy (EMA) methods from the CASP13 competition.
  • Application of deep learning techniques and residue-residue contact predictions for accuracy estimation.
  • Evaluation using local similarity criteria like lDDT and CAD.

Main Results:

  • Several top EMA methods demonstrated improved performance on CASP13 targets compared to CASP12.
  • Deep learning and contact prediction contributed to advancements in EMA.
  • The best EMA methods outperformed CASP13 servers in selecting superior models.
  • Single model accuracy methods showed better performance than consensus-based methods for local similarity evaluations.

Conclusions:

  • Estimation of model accuracy (EMA) has seen measurable progress, with new methods outperforming previous benchmarks.
  • Deep learning integration is a key driver for improved protein model accuracy prediction.
  • While EMA methods excel at selecting better models, further improvements are possible, especially in local accuracy assessments.