Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry
Published on: June 6, 2018
Traditional trapping methods outperform eDNA sampling for introduced semi-aquatic snakes
Jonathan P Rose1, Cara Wademan2, Suzanne Weir3
1Department of Wildlife, Fish & Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys were less effective than traditional trapping for detecting invasive watersnakes in California. Both methods detected Northern water snakes more often than Banded water snakes, highlighting the need to compare survey types for invasive species management.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Conservation Biology
- Environmental Science
Background:
- Invasive species management faces resource limitations, making regional-scale traditional surveys challenging.
- Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is a promising tool for invasive species detection, but its efficacy compared to traditional methods needs further investigation.
- Occupancy modeling offers a robust framework for comparing detection probabilities of different survey techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the detection probability of environmental DNA (eDNA) and traditional aquatic trapping for two introduced watersnake species in California.
- To assess the efficacy of a newly developed qPCR assay for detecting invasive watersnakes.
- To inform invasive species management strategies by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of eDNA versus traditional survey methods.
Main Methods:
- Developed and utilized a qPCR assay to detect the eDNA of Banded (Nerodia fasciata) and Northern (Nerodia sipedon) watersnakes.
- Collected water samples from 91 sites across California near known introduced populations.
- Deployed aquatic funnel traps at a subset of these sites to capture watersnakes.
Main Results:
- eDNA detected N. fasciata at one site, while trapping detected it at three sites.
- eDNA detected N. sipedon at one site, which was also the only site where trapping was successful for this species.
- Traditional trapping exhibited a higher detection probability than eDNA surveys for both species, with higher detection rates for N. sipedon than N. fasciata.
Conclusions:
- Traditional survey methods can offer higher detection probabilities than eDNA sampling for certain invasive species.
- Both eDNA and traditional methods showed higher detection success for N. sipedon compared to N. fasciata.
- Managers should compare eDNA and traditional survey methods within an occupancy framework to select the most effective approach for detecting new invasive populations.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Social Traps
Convenience Sampling Method
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
Sampling Methods: Overview
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...

