Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

A Structured Approach to Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Rats
Published on: July 18, 2025
The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing
Jefta van Dijk1, Robert G T Blokpoel2, Alette A Koopman2
1Division of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Internal Postal Code CA 62, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.van.dijk01@umcg.nl.
Insights
Withholding pressure support (PS) during extubation readiness tests (ERT) in children does not significantly increase the work of breathing (WOBimp). Clinical outcomes remain unaffected, suggesting PS may not be necessary for ERTs in this population.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Respiratory Physiology
- Mechanical Ventilation
Background:
- Pediatric critical care commonly uses pressure support (PS) during extubation readiness tests (ERT) to reduce the imposed work of breathing (WOBimp).
- Limited pediatric data exists on the necessity of PS during ERTs.
- This study aimed to quantify WOBimp during ERTs with and without PS in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To measure the imposed work of breathing (WOBimp) during extubation readiness tests (ERT) in children.
- To compare WOBimp with and without added pressure support (PS).
- To investigate the clinical correlates of WOBimp changes during ERT.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 112 spontaneously breathing ventilated children (<18 years) undergoing ERT.
- Tracheal manometry was used to calculate WOBimp under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with and without PS.
- Patients with post-extubation upper airway obstruction were excluded.
Main Results:
- WOBimp was significantly higher without PS (median 0.27 J/L) compared to with PS (median 0.00 J/L).
- Statistically significant changes in respiratory rate, ET-CO2, and tidal volume occurred without PS, but were clinically irrelevant.
- The Comfort B score remained unaffected, and WOBimp changes were independent of endotracheal tube size.
Conclusions:
- Withholding PS during ERT in children does not result in clinically significant increases in WOBimp.
- The findings suggest that PS may not be essential during ERTs in pediatric patients.
- WOBimp during ERT is independent of endotracheal tube size.
Background:
Paediatric critical care practitioners often make use of pressure support (PS) to overcome the perceived imposed work of breathing (WOBimp) during an extubation readiness test (ERT). However, no paediatric data are available that shows the necessity of adding of pressure support during such tests. We sought to measure the WOBimp during an ERT with and without added pressure support and to study its clinical correlate. This was a prospective study in spontaneously breathing ventilated children < 18 years undergoing ERT. Using tracheal manometry, WOBimp was calculated by integrating the difference between positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tracheal pressure (Ptrach) over the measured expiratory tidal volume (VTe) under two paired conditions: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with and without PS. Patients with post-extubation upper airway obstruction were excluded.
Results:
A total of 112 patients were studied. Median PS during the ERT was 10 cmH2O. WOBimp was significantly higher without PS (median 0.27, IQR 0.20-0.50 J/L) than with added PS (median 0.00, IQR 0.00-0.11 J/L). Although there were statistically significant changes in spontaneous breath rate [32 (23-42) vs. 37 (27-46) breaths/min, p < 0.001] and higher ET-CO2 [5.90 (5.38-6.65) vs. 6.23 (5.55-6.94) kPa, p < 0.001] and expiratory Vt decreased [7.72 (6.66-8.97) vs. 7.08 (5.82-8.08) mL/kg, p < 0.001] in the absence of PS, these changes appeared clinically irrelevant since the Comfort B score remained unaffected [12 (10-13) vs. 12 (10-13), P = 0.987]. Multivariable analysis showed that changes in WOBimp occurred independent of endotracheal tube size.
Conclusions:
Withholding PS during ERT does not lead to clinically relevant increases in WOBimp, irrespective of endotracheal tube size.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Breathing
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
Ready Mixed Concrete
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Mechanism of Breathing II: Expiration
Expiration, or exhaling, is a complex physiological process that begins as the inspiratory muscles begin to relax. This relaxation triggers a series of events that epitomize the efficiency of the respiratory system.
Mechanism of Expiration:
Mechanism of Breathing I: Inspiration
The respiratory system, an essential network for breathing, comprises the conducting and respiratory zones, each playing a crucial role in the overall process of respiration. Let us explore the detailed mechanism of inspiration, or inhalation, which is the first phase of the respiratory cycle.
Pathway of Air during Inspiration
During inspiration, air enters our body through the nose or mouth and moves through the conducting zone,...

