Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

A Delayed Inoculation Model of Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Wound Infection
Published on: February 20, 2020
Outcome of early vs delayed surgery for infective mitral endocarditis
Antti Huuskonen1, Antti Vento1, Peter Raivio1
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Background And Aim Of The Study:
Timing of surgery for infective endocarditis is controversial. The objective of this study was to report the outcomes of early vs delayed surgery (DS) of mitral endocarditis.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated surgically for mitral endocarditis between 2005 and 2016 in a single center. We analyzed midterm outcomes of early surgery (ES; surgery within 7 days or less of prior directed antibiotic treatment) in comparison to DS (surgery after more than 7 days of prior directed antibiotic treatment).
Results:
Survival of all patients was 87% at one and 72% at 5 years. Mean follow-up time was 4.0 ± 3.1 years. Thirty-three (36.3%) patients were in the ES and 58 (63.7%) were in the DS group. Patients with ES were younger (47.4 vs 55.3 years), were in New York Heart Association class III or IV more frequently (97.0 vs 65.5%), and had higher EuroScore2 (15.6 vs 8.6%). The ES group had lower freedom from valve reoperation (98.2 vs 87.2%; P = .035) and the composite endpoint of >2 + regurgitation or reoperation at 5 years (98.2 vs 72.7%; P = .004).
Conclusions:
ES was associated with a higher rate of reoperations and the composite endpoint of recurrent MR or reoperation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Predicting Reaction Outcomes

