Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Self-efficacy and self-management strategies in acute intermittent porphyria
Marte H Hammersland1, Aasne K Aarsand2,3, Sverre Sandberg2,3
1Norwegian Porphyria Centre (NAPOS), Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Post Office Box 1400, N-5021, Bergen, Norway. marte.hovik.hammersland@helse-bergen.no.
Background:
Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is an inherited metabolic disease with low clinical penetrance caused by mutations in the hydroxymethylbilane (HMBS) gene. Although most patients experience little or no symptoms, serious attacks may include excruciating pain, severe electrolyte disturbances, paresis, and respiratory failure. Several drugs and lifestyle factors are potential attack inducers and avoiding known triggers is important to avoid symptomatic disease in both patients and genetically predisposed carriers. Our aim in this study was to describe self-efficacy and self-management strategies in self-reported symptomatic and asymptomatic HMBS mutation carriers, and to elucidate motives for predictive genetic testing.
Methods:
This is a cross-sectional retrospective survey with postal questionnaires. We received responses from 140 HMBS carriers for the general self-efficacy scale (GSES), study-specific questions about symptoms, self-management strategies and motives for genetic testing and satisfaction with the genetic counseling scale (SCS).
Results:
The results indicated high levels of self-efficacy in these Norwegian HMBS mutation carriers. Both self-reported symptomatic and asymptomatic cases recorded changes in behavior after diagnosis, such as avoiding possible triggering drugs and aspiring recommended eating habits. They were in general satisfied with the genetic counseling they had received. The possibility to prevent disease and learn about the risk of their children was their most important motives to undergo genetic testing.
Conclusions:
This study indicates that continuing to provide information, counseling and education is beneficial in AIP, and that HMBS mutation carriers, both those self-assessed as asymptomatic and as symptomatic, are using their knowledge to avoid triggering factors.
More Related Videos
05:15Author Spotlight: Accessible M&M-Based Mouse Model for Investigating Binge Eating Disorder - Insights into Eating Behaviors, Anxiety, and Neural Mechanisms
Published on: January 10, 2025
05:45Delivery of In Vivo Acute Intermittent Hypoxia in Neonatal Rodents to Prime Subventricular Zone-derived Neural Progenitor Cell Cultures
Published on: November 2, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Self-Efficacy
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions