Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Published on: September 28, 2019
Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy using da Vinci Xi vs. Si: are there differences?
Zuliang Feng1, Michael P Feng2, David P Feng3
1Department of Perioperative Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. zuliang.feng@vumc.org.
The da Vinci Xi robot offers faster anesthesia and procedure times for robotic-assisted adrenalectomy compared to the Si model. While consumables costs were higher, overall costs were lower, demonstrating Xi
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Robotic Surgery
- Surgical Technology
Background:
- The da Vinci Xi system, released in 2014, succeeded the Si platform for minimally invasive surgery.
- Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy has become a standard procedure for adrenal gland removal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare peri-operative outcomes of robotic-assisted adrenalectomy between the da Vinci Xi and Si platforms.
- To evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the da Vinci Xi system in adrenalectomy.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 85 consecutive robotic-assisted adrenalectomies performed between June 2014 and the study's end.
- Patients were divided into two groups: Xi (n=25) and Si (n=60).
- Peri-operative outcomes including anesthesia time, procedure time, docking time, consumables fees, relative costs, and hospital stay were compared.
Main Results:
- The Xi group demonstrated significantly shorter average anesthesia time (145.8 min vs. 170.4 min) and procedure time (92.1 min vs. 122.5 min) compared to the Si group (p<0.001 for both).
- Average docking time was also reduced with the Xi system (18.2 min vs. 20.3 min, p=0.04).
- While average consumables fees were higher for Xi ($1246 vs. $1106, p=0.04), calculated relative costs were lower ($3375 vs. $3527, p=0.03). Post-operative hospital stay was similar between groups (1.6 days vs. 1.7 days, p=0.18).
Conclusions:
- Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy using the da Vinci Xi system is effective and efficient.
- The Xi system offers significant improvements in operative efficiency over the Si system.
- Outcomes were comparable between the Xi and Si groups, with the Xi system showing potential cost benefits.
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI)

