Are We Doing Enough to Reduce Ionizing Radiation Exposure in Children?: An Analysis of Current Approaches to Pediatric Appendicitis Imaging at a Major Urban Medical Center
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Shweta Iyer1, Juhee Patel2, Marc Moscatelli3
1From the Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Insights
This study evaluated imaging for suspected appendicitis (AP) in children. While CT scans were common, researchers aim to increase MRI use to improve diagnosis and reduce CT exposure.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Gastrointestinal Disorders
Background:
- Appendicitis (AP) is a common surgical emergency in children.
- Accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment and preventing complications.
- Current imaging modalities in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) warrant evaluation for optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the utilization and effectiveness of current imaging techniques for suspected appendicitis (AP) in a pediatric emergency department (ED).
- To identify patterns in imaging choices, diagnostic accuracy, and patient outcomes.
- To inform future strategies for improving diagnostic imaging in pediatric AP cases.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of charts for children aged 6-18 years presenting with suspected AP in 2016.
- Data collected included patient demographics, timing of evaluation, imaging studies performed (ultrasound, CT, MRI), results, and patient disposition.
- Statistical analysis of imaging modality usage, diagnostic yield, and clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- Of 292 children with suspected AP, ultrasound was the most common initial imaging study (287), with 60.3% yielding equivocal results.
- Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed in 13.9% of patients, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 0.7%.
- The overall appendicitis (AP) rate was 28.4%, with 97.5% of appendectomies confirming abnormal appendices.
Conclusions:
- Computed tomography (CT) scans were utilized in a significant portion of pediatric suspected appendicitis cases.
- The high rate of equivocal ultrasound findings highlights a potential area for improvement in diagnostic accuracy.
- Future strategies should explore increased use of MRI and other advanced imaging modalities to potentially reduce reliance on CT scans and improve diagnostic yield.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate current imaging approaches in children with suspected appendicitis (AP) in the pediatric emergency department (ED) of a major urban medical center.
Methods:
Children aged 6 to 18 years who presented to a pediatric ED in 2016 with possible AP were identified by a keyword search. Charts were reviewed for the following: age, sex, time of evaluation, imaging study, results of imaging study, disposition, and outcome.
Results:
We calculated mean values and SD for continuous data. Initially, 503 charts were identified. Of these 503, 292 children were identified as having possible AP. Mean age was 10.7 years (SD, 2.7); 50.6% presented between 5:00 PM and 8:00 AM the next morning. Of the 287 US studies performed, 114 (39.7%) were definitively positive or negative. Of these, 46 (16.0%) were negative for AP and 68 (23.7%) were positive. There were 173 (60.3%) ultrasounds that were equivocal. Computed tomography scans were performed in 41 (13.9%) of the total 292 patients, and 2 (0.7%) of the 292 received magnetic resonance imaging. Patient dispositions were as follows: discharged home, 163 (55.8%); admitted for appendectomy, 69 (23.6%); admitted for observation, 37 (12.7%); and extended observation in ED, 10 (3.4%). There were 83 (28.4%) total surgical and interventional radiology cases and 209 (71.6%) nonsurgical cases. Of the 81 appendectomies, 79 (97.5%) had an abnormal appendix, and 2 (2.5%) had no AP. Of the 79 abnormal appendices, 22 (27.8%) were perforated, 55 (69.6%) were not, and 2 (2.6%) were unclear.
Conclusions:
Computed tomography scans were performed in 13.9% of patients with suspected AP. The overall AP rate was 28.4%. We plan to increase the use of magnetic resonance imaging and other modalities to reduce overall computed tomography usage.
Related Concept Videos
Biological Effects of Radiation
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Ionization Energy
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Mesh Analysis with Current Sources
Current Source in One Mesh: The analysis process is straightforward when a current source is found in only one mesh within the circuit. Mesh currents are assigned as usual, with the mesh containing the current source excluded from the analysis. Kirchhoff's voltage law...
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...

