Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Accuracy in clinical electron beam dose planning using pencil beam algorithms.

I Lax1

  • 1Department of Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
|December 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary

Comparing electron beam dose planning models, the generalized Gaussian model is more accurate for oblique incidence. The standard Gaussian model better predicts doses within low-density phantom cavities.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Specification of Dose Delivery in Radiation Therapy. Recommendations by the Nordic Association of Clinical Physics (NACP).

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2017
Same author

Attenuation of signaling pathways stimulated by pathologically activated FGF-receptor 2 mutants prevents craniosynostosis.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2006
Same author

Essential role of Shp2-binding sites on FRS2alpha for corticogenesis and for FGF2-dependent proliferation of neural progenitor cells.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2005
Same author

The docking protein FRS2alpha is an essential component of multiple fibroblast growth factor responses during early mouse development.

Molecular and cellular biology·2005
Same author

Cellular signaling by fibroblast growth factor receptors.

Cytokine & growth factor reviews·2005
Same author

Tyrosine phosphorylation sites on FRS2alpha responsible for Shp2 recruitment are critical for induction of lens and retina.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2004

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Computational Dosimetry

Background:

  • Accurate electron beam dose planning is crucial for effective radiotherapy.
  • Pencil beam models are widely used but require validation against experimental data.
  • Evaluating model accuracy in complex geometries is essential for clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of two electron pencil beam models in 2D geometries.
  • To assess model performance using measured dose distributions in anatomical phantoms.
  • To determine which model provides better accuracy under various conditions, including oblique incidence and low-density cavities.

Main Methods:

  • Two electron pencil beam models were investigated: one using the Gaussian approximation (Fermi-Eyges) and another, the generalized Gaussian model, incorporating large-angle scattering.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Both models employed the parallel slab approximation.
  • Dose distributions were measured using thermoluminescence dosimetry (LiF rods) in two anatomical phantoms (breast cancer chest wall/lung and head/nose) and a homogeneous water phantom for oblique incidence studies.
  • Main Results:

    • The generalized Gaussian model demonstrated higher accuracy for oblique incidence and in geometries where the semi-infinite slab approximation is valid.
    • The standard Gaussian model showed better agreement with experimental data within and behind low-density cavities.
    • Discrepancies were attributed to balancing errors between slab and scattering approximations in the Gaussian model.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of electron pencil beam model impacts dose calculation accuracy, particularly in complex anatomical regions.
    • The generalized Gaussian model offers improved accuracy for oblique incidence scenarios.
    • The standard Gaussian model may be more suitable for regions with low-density cavities due to error compensation.