Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
Published on: February 7, 2025
Mortality Rates in Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
Sadikah Behbehani1, Elena Suarez-Salvador1, Matthew Buras1
1Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (Drs. Behbehani, Suarez-Salvador, Magtibay, Magrina, and Mr. Buras); Universidad Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (Dr. Suarez-Salvador).
Objective:
To review early operative mortality (<30 days) for minimally invasive surgery (MIS), laparoscopic and robotic, in gynecologic oncology.
Data Sources:
An electronic-based search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database in the last 10 years.
Methods Of Study Selection:
All MIS studies in gynecologic oncology reporting operative mortality from any cause (within 30 days) were included. Studies were excluded if mortality was not reported for MIS or included benign gynecology.
Tabulation, Integration, And Results:
Meta-analysis was applied to calculate pooled mortality rates using the inverse-variance method. The relative risks and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Sixty-five studies were included (39 183 patients) for an operative mortality of 1:381 (95% CI, 1:306-1:474). Studies were subselected and analyzed by procedures, malignancy, and surgical approach. Of 39 183 patients, 38 619 underwent any type of hysterectomy for a mortality of 1:379 (95% CI, 1:304-1:472). The mortality was 1:281 (95% CI, 1:169-1:469) for a laparoscopic approach and 1:476 (95% CI, 1:365-1:620) for a robotic approach. There were 3369 patients with early cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy with a mortality of 1:2049 (95% CI, 1:356-1:11 832). There were 3501 patients with endometrial cancer undergoing hysterectomy with lymph node dissection with a mortality of 1:195 (95% CI, 1:109-1:349). There were 418 patients with ovarian cancer undergoing MIS procedures with a mortality of 1 in 685 (95% CI, 1:44-1:10971). Eleven studies with 4037 patients compared mortality of gynecologic oncology surgery of any type (laparoscopic [1:626] vs robotic [1:716] for a relative risk of 1.12 [95% CI, 0.35-3.49]).
Conclusion:
The overall operative mortality for minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology is 1 in 381 (95% CI, 1:306-1:474). For patients with early cervical cancer, it is 1:2049 (95% CI, 1:356-1: 11832), for endometrial cancer with node dissection it is 1:195 (95% CI, 1:109-1:349), and for ovarian cancer it is 1 in 685 (95% CI, 1:44-1:10 971). There is no difference between the type of MIS approach for patients undergoing any type of gynecologic oncology surgery.
Insights
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in gynecologic oncology has an overall operative mortality of 1:381. Laparoscopic and robotic approaches show similar safety profiles for these procedures.
Area of Science:
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly utilized in gynecologic oncology.
- Assessing early operative mortality is crucial for understanding the safety of MIS techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review early operative mortality (less than 30 days) for both laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology.
- To compare the safety of different MIS approaches in gynecologic cancer surgery.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted across major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane) covering the last 10 years.
- Included studies reported operative mortality within 30 days for MIS in gynecologic oncology, excluding benign cases or studies not reporting mortality.
- Meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled mortality rates and relative risks with 95% confidence intervals.
Main Results:
- Sixty-five studies involving 39,183 patients were analyzed, revealing an overall operative mortality of 1:381 (95% CI, 1:306-1:474).
- Mortality rates varied by specific cancer type: 1:2049 for early cervical cancer, 1:195 for endometrial cancer with lymph node dissection, and 1:685 for ovarian cancer.
- Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic approaches for general gynecologic oncology surgery showed no significant difference in mortality (RR 1.12, 95% CI, 0.35-3.49).
Conclusions:
- The overall early operative mortality for MIS in gynecologic oncology is low, at 1:381.
- Specific mortality risks are identified for cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers treated with MIS.
- Both laparoscopic and robotic surgical approaches demonstrate comparable safety in terms of operative mortality for gynecologic oncology procedures.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Reaction Rate
The mathematical representation of the change in the concentration of reactants and products, over time, is the rate...
Speciation Rates
Related Rates

