Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Acute Myocardial Infarction in Rats
Published on: February 16, 2011
Extended dual antiplatelet therapy after acute myocardial infarction. Current evidence and future perspectives
Nicola Cosentino1, Jeness Campodonico, Valentina Milazzo
1Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan. nicola.cosentino@ccfm.it.
Insights
Patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) face a high risk of repeat ischemic events. Identifying those who benefit from extended dual antiplatelet therapy is crucial for improved outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have elevated risks of recurrent ischemic events post-discharge.
- Current guidelines recommend assessing residual ischemic risk to guide prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).
- Existing risk scores often lack applicability to AMI patients or are too complex for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence on prolonged DAPT use in post-AMI patients.
- To focus on identifying high-risk individuals who may benefit from extended DAPT.
- To address the challenge of balancing clinical benefit against bleeding risk.
Main Methods:
- Review of current evidence on prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after AMI.
- Analysis of recent advances in identifying high-risk patient populations.
- Consideration of net clinical benefit and bleeding risk.
Main Results:
- Optimal medical therapy alone may not suffice for all post-AMI patients.
- The identification of ideal candidates for prolonged DAPT remains challenging.
- Balancing ischemic risk reduction with bleeding risk is paramount.
Conclusions:
- Further research is needed to refine risk stratification for prolonged DAPT in AMI.
- Personalized therapeutic strategies are essential for managing post-AMI patients.
- Identifying patients with favorable net clinical benefit is key to optimizing DAPT duration.
Abstract:
Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at increased risk of recurrent ischemic events after hospital discharge, despite optimal medical therapy. Current practice guidelines strongly encourage the early assessment of the residual ischemic risk in post-AMI patients, in order to identify those who may benefit from a prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. To this end, some scoring systems have been proposed. However, most scores were developed for patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Moreover, nearly all failed to be implemented in everyday clinical practice, probably because of the perceived complexity due to the large number of incorporated variables. Therefore, the identification of the ideal AMI patient who can benefit from a prolonged (beyond 1 year after the index event) dual antiplatelet therapy remains to be clarified, especially when the bleeding risk associated with such therapy is considered. In this review, we summarize the current evidence on the prolonged use of dual antiplatelet therapy after AMI, with a special focus on recent advances regarding the identification of high-risk patients who may derive a favorable net clinical benefit from such a therapeutic strategy.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...

