Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Primary Outcome Assessment in a Pig Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published on: October 14, 2016
Integration of Publicly Reported Center Outcomes into Standards and Accreditation: The FACT Model.
Charles F LeMaistre1, Kara K Wacker2, Luke P Akard3
1Sarah Cannon, Nashville, Tennessee; Clinical Outcomes Improvement Committee, Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
The Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT) uses patient outcomes from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) to set accreditation standards and improve care quality in blood and marrow transplantation (BMT).
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Quality Improvement in Healthcare
Background:
- The evolution of blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) necessitated quality oversight.
- Key organizations like the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) and the Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT) emerged to address care quality.
- The National Quality Strategy (NQS) identified nine elements for healthcare improvement, including registries, accreditation, and public reporting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe how FACT integrates CIBMTR patient outcome data into its accreditation standards.
- To outline requirements for BMT programs with below-expected performance.
- To present initial findings on the effectiveness of corrective action plans for improving outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the process by which FACT incorporates CIBMTR outcome data.
- Review of accreditation requirements for underperforming programs.
- Assessment of corrective action plans submitted by accredited programs.
Main Results:
- FACT utilizes CIBMTR data to inform and update its accreditation standards.
- Specific requirements are in place for programs failing to meet expected performance benchmarks.
- Preliminary assessment indicates that corrective action plans are being evaluated for their potential to enhance patient outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The integration of CIBMTR data by FACT is a critical mechanism for quality assurance in BMT.
- Accreditation processes are adapting to ensure continuous improvement in patient care.
- Ongoing evaluation of corrective actions is essential for driving better outcomes in BMT programs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Measurement: Standard Units
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Center of Mass
The knowledge of the center of mass can also help us to describe and predict the motion of objects. For example, when a ball is thrown...

