[Diced cartilage used in rhinoplasty procedures]

Septorhinoplasty aims to achieve a smooth nasal contour. Current practices rely on autologous grafts due to their biocompatibility. While structural grafts provide foundational support, contour adjustments remain a challenge. Prior research has shown that autologous cartilage reduces rejection risks. However, no prior work had resolved how to achieve fine contouring without compromising structure. This gap motivated the exploration of diced cartilage (DC) and diced cartilage framework (DCF) techniques. The regenerative potential of DC and DCF with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) remains understudied. No prior work had resolved the long-term stability of these grafts. That uncertainty drove the need to evaluate DC and DCF as contouring tools.

The study aimed to assess the role of diced cartilage (DC) and diced cartilage framework (DCF) in septorhinoplasty contouring. It focused on the application of DC and DCF as supplementary components after structural grafts. The goal was to determine how these grafts integrate into nasal contouring without affecting structural integrity. The study also examined the use of PRF to enhance graft integration. No prior work had resolved the optimal timing for DC and DCF application. The authors sought to clarify how these grafts maintain shape and avoid resorption. They also aimed to evaluate the ease of preparation and sculpting of DC and DCF grafts. The study sought to provide evidence for routine use of DC and DCF in nasal contouring.

The study evaluated the preparation and application of diced cartilage (DC) and diced cartilage framework (DCF) in septorhinoplasty. Autologous cartilage was used, with grafts shaped variably for nasal contouring. PRF was added to enhance integration potential. The grafts were either applied freely under the skin or wrapped with fascia and perichondrium. The surgical assistant prepared DC and DCF grafts during the procedure. PRF preparation followed standardized protocols. The grafts were applied after structural support was established. The study assessed the flexibility and ease of use of DC and DCF in contouring.

DC and DCF grafts maintained consistent mass without resorption. They were applied after structural grafts to refine nasal contouring. PRF addition was proposed to support regenerative potential. Grafts were easily prepared and sculpted during surgery. No overcorrection was recommended due to graft stability. The grafts were suitable for contour modeling but not structural reinforcement. Application occurred at the end of septorhinoplasty procedures. The study suggested DC and DCF as reliable contouring tools.

The authors propose that DC and DCF grafts are suitable for contour modeling in septorhinoplasty. They suggest these grafts maintain shape and integrate well into nasal contours. The study indicates that DC and DCF should be used after structural grafts. The addition of PRF may support graft integration. The authors propose that the technique is easy to learn and flexible. They suggest that DC and DCF are not resorbed and remain stable. The authors propose that these grafts should be applied at the end of procedures. They suggest that DC and DCF are recommended for routine contour modeling.