Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Diagnosing type 2 myocardial infarction in clinical routine. A validation study
Anton Gard1,2, Bertil Lindahl1,2, Gorav Batra1,2
1Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
The SWEDEHEART registry moderately validates type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) classification. Studies using SWEDEHEART for type 2 MI prevalence require caution due to underestimation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- The Swedish registry for myocardial infarction (SWEDEHEART) classifies MI subtypes since 2010.
- Previous studies have utilized SWEDEHEART for type 2 MI research.
- The accuracy of SWEDEHEART's type 2 MI classification has not been validated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the accuracy of type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) classification within the SWEDEHEART registry.
- To compare SWEDEHEART's MI classification against a gold standard based on The Third Universal Definition of MI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective classification of 772 MI patients from 2011 using SWEDEHEART data.
- Independent reviewers applied The Third Universal Definition of MI as the gold standard.
- Comparison of gold standard classification with SWEDEHEART registry data.
Main Results:
- SWEDEHEART classified 6.2% of patients as type 2 MI, versus 12.0% by the gold standard.
- Positive predictive value for type 2 MI in SWEDEHEART was 62.5%.
- Moderate agreement (κ=0.43) was observed between SWEDEHEART and the gold standard for type 2 MI.
Conclusions:
- SWEDEHEART demonstrates moderate agreement with the gold standard for type 2 MI classification.
- Studies relying on SWEDEHEART for type 2 MI diagnosis should be interpreted with caution.
- The SWEDEHEART registry significantly underestimates type 2 MI prevalence and is not suitable for such studies.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Reliability and Validity
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

