Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Imaging Pericytes Post-Subarachnoid Hemorrhaging in Rodents
Published on: August 18, 2023
Vital Signs: Surveillance for Acute Flaccid Myelitis - United States, 2018
Adriana Lopez1, Adria Lee1, Angela Guo1
1Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC.
Background:
Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), a serious paralytic illness, was first recognized as a distinct condition in 2014, when cases were reported concurrent with a large U.S. outbreak of severe respiratory illness caused by enterovirus D-68 (EV-D68). Since 2014, nationwide outbreaks of AFM have occurred every 2 years in the United States; the cause for the recent change in the epidemiology of AFM in the United States, including the occurrence of outbreaks and a biennial periodicity since 2014, is under investigation. This report updates clinical, laboratory, and outcome data for cases reported to CDC during 2018.
Methods:
Clinical data and specimens from persons in the United States who met the clinical criterion for AFM (acute onset of flaccid limb weakness) with onset in 2018 were submitted to CDC for classification of the illnesses as confirmed, probable, or non-AFM cases. Enterovirus/rhinovirus (EV/RV) testing was performed on available specimens from persons meeting the clinical criterion. Descriptive analyses, laboratory results, and indicators of early recognition and reporting are summarized.
Results:
From January through December 2018, among 374 reported cases of AFM, 233 (62%) (from 41 states) were classified as confirmed, 26 (7%) as probable, and 115 (31%) as non-AFM cases. Median ages of patients with confirmed, probable, and non-AFM cases were 5.3, 2.9, and 8.8 years, respectively. Laboratory testing identified multiple EV/RV types, primarily in respiratory and stool specimens, in 44% of confirmed cases. Among confirmed cases, the interval from onset of limb weakness until specimen collection ranged from 2 to 7 days, depending on specimen type. Interval from onset of limb weakness until reporting to CDC during 2018 ranged from 18 to 36 days, with confirmed and probable cases reported earlier than non-AFM cases.
Conclusion:
Identification of risk factors leading to outbreaks of AFM remains a public health priority. Prompt recognition of signs and symptoms, early specimen collection, and complete and rapid reporting will expedite public health investigations and research studies to elucidate the recent epidemiology of AFM and subsequently inform treatment and prevention recommendations.
Insights
Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) outbreaks occur biennially in the US. In 2018, 233 confirmed cases were reported, with enterovirus/rhinovirus identified in 44% of patients.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Infectious Diseases
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a serious paralytic illness first recognized in 2014.
- AFM outbreaks have occurred biennially in the US since 2014, often coinciding with enterovirus D-68 (EV-D68) outbreaks.
- The changing epidemiology of AFM in the US is under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To update clinical, laboratory, and outcome data for AFM cases reported to the CDC in 2018.
- To analyze the characteristics of confirmed, probable, and non-AFM cases.
- To assess the role of enterovirus/rhinovirus (EV/RV) in AFM cases.
Main Methods:
- Clinical data and specimens were collected from individuals meeting the AFM clinical criterion (acute onset of flaccid limb weakness) with onset in 2018.
- Specimens were tested for enterovirus/rhinovirus (EV/RV).
- Descriptive analyses of clinical data, laboratory results, and reporting timeliness were performed.
Main Results:
- In 2018, 374 AFM cases were reported; 233 (62%) were confirmed, 26 (7%) probable, and 115 (31%) non-AFM.
- Median ages for confirmed, probable, and non-AFM cases were 5.3, 2.9, and 8.8 years, respectively.
- EV/RV was identified in 44% of confirmed cases, primarily in respiratory and stool specimens. Reporting intervals varied by case classification.
Conclusions:
- Identifying AFM risk factors is a public health priority.
- Prompt recognition, early specimen collection, and rapid reporting are crucial for public health investigations.
- These actions will aid research into AFM epidemiology and inform treatment and prevention strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Vital Signs
Vital signs help healthcare professionals assess an individual's well-being and detect any functional changes...
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Signs of Puberty
Introduction to the Sign Test
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
Sign Test for Nominal Data
For example, consider a...

