Cardiac MRI Endpoints in Myocardial Infarction Experimental and Clinical Trials: JACC Scientific Expert Panel

Borja Ibanez1, Anthony H Aletras2, Andrew E Arai3

  • 1Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain; CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain; Cardiology Department, IIS Fundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Insights

Standardizing cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) methods is crucial for evaluating cardioprotective strategies after myocardial infarction (MI). This consensus document recommends CMR endpoints based on pathophysiology to improve clinical trial translation and patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Medical Imaging
  • Translational Science

Background:

  • Myocardial infarction (MI) triggers dynamic tissue changes impacting long-term prognosis.
  • Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for noninvasive myocardial tissue characterization and assessing cardioprotective strategies.
  • Heterogeneity in CMR methodologies across trials hinders translation of findings into clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide expert recommendations for selecting standardized CMR endpoints in experimental and clinical trials.
  • To align CMR endpoint selection with underlying pathophysiology and association with hard clinical outcomes.
  • To improve the consistency and translational value of CMR in cardiovascular research.

Main Methods:

  • A scientific expert panel convened to review current CMR methodologies in MI research.
  • Recommendations were developed based on the pathophysiology of post-MI tissue changes.
  • Emphasis was placed on linking CMR findings to hard clinical outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Identified critical need for standardization in CMR acquisition protocols and endpoint selection.
  • Proposed a framework for selecting CMR endpoints that reflect pathophysiological processes post-MI.
  • Highlighted the importance of correlating CMR metrics with hard clinical outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized CMR endpoints are essential for robust evaluation of cardioprotective therapies.
  • Recommendations aim to enhance the reliability and clinical applicability of CMR in MI trials.
  • Adoption of these guidelines will facilitate better translation of research findings to patient care.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.2K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.6K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
65.3K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
260.2K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.9K
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials01:12

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials

Statistical software is pivotal in data analysis and clinical trials by providing tools to analyze data, draw conclusions, and make predictions. These software packages range from simple data management applications to complex analytical platforms, supporting various statistical tests, models, and simulation techniques. Their significance lies in their ability to handle vast amounts of data with precision and efficiency, enabling researchers to validate hypotheses, identify trends, and make...
1.4K