Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection01:26

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection

13.3K
The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
13.3K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

1.3K
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
1.3K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

9.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.0K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MR-Guided PET Denoising and Resolution Enhancement Improves Visual Interpretation and Preserves Quantitative Behavior Across Amyloid Tracers.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

MRI and Clinical Features of Nonenhancing <i>IDH</i>-Wild-Type Glioblastomas: How to Make an Early Diagnosis and Distinguish from Mimics.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis Using Multimodal Deep Learning Integrating Lesion and Normal-Appearing White Matter: A Retrospective Study with International Multicentre External Validation.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Features of Diffuse Hemispheric Glioma, H3 G34-Mutant: An International Multi-institutional Study.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

Progressive axonal degeneration in white matter pathways traversing peritumoral penumbra in frontotemporal glioma.

Computational diffusion MRI. CDMRI (Workshop)·2026
Same author

Clinically Feasible White Matter Fiber Tractography in Peritumoral Zones With Cerebral Vasogenic Edema.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors
08:50

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors

Published on: July 16, 2018

8.6K

Risk Factors for Perceptual-versus-Interpretative Errors in Diagnostic Neuroradiology.

S H Patel1, C L Stanton2, S G Miller2

  • 1From the Departments of Radiology and Medical Imaging (S.H.P.) shp4k@virginia.edu.

AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology
|July 13, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Diagnostic errors in neuroradiology are classified as perception or interpretation errors. Interpretation errors are linked to less experienced radiologists and MR imaging, while perception errors correlate with higher reading rates.

More Related Videos

Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
10:11

Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies

Published on: October 22, 2014

19.6K
Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
06:31

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors
08:50

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors

Published on: July 16, 2018

8.6K
Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
10:11

Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies

Published on: October 22, 2014

19.6K
Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
06:31

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Diagnostic Errors

Background:

  • Diagnostic errors in radiology are categorized as perception or interpretation errors.
  • Understanding the factors influencing these error types is crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if specific conditions differ between perception and interpretation errors in neuroradiology.
  • To identify risk factors associated with each error type to guide error reduction strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 254 diagnostic neuroradiology error cases.
  • Classification of errors into perception or interpretation categories.
  • Characterization of factors including imaging technique, radiologist experience, abnormality location, disease, and workflow parameters (time of day, reading rate).

Main Results:

  • Perception errors (74.8%) were more common than interpretation errors (25.2%).
  • Interpretation errors were associated with less experienced attending physicians (≤5 years), MR imaging (vs. CT), and infectious/inflammatory/autoimmune diseases.
  • Perception errors were linked to faster reading rates and occurred later in the shift.

Conclusions:

  • Neuroradiologist experience, imaging technique, and case reading volume/rate influence interpretation versus perception errors.
  • Identifying these risk factors is key to developing effective error reduction programs in clinical neuroradiology.