Reflections on the Complexity of Surgical Site Infection Prevention and Detection from an Organizational Lens

Within the United States, surgical site infections (SSIs) have now become the most common hospital-acquired infection and impact 2%-5% of all surgical patients. It is estimated that approximately 60% of SSIs could be prevented through improved adherence to pre-existing practice guidelines. The myriad of contributing factors leading to SSIs highlights the need for a multi-faceted approach. Although collaboration and coordination among providers and patients represents a requirement of any sustainable solution, it also creates a space and possible role for innovative technologies and mobile applications utilizing patient-generated health data (PGHD). Upon analysis of hospital practice, we have identified substantial variability in documentation, peri-operative care, and post-discharge instruction with regard to SSI prevention and incision care techniques. This variability is further exacerbated by a loss of information within each transition of patient care. As a result, a patient's risk of SSI often becomes dictated by their provider's preferred (and sometimes arbitrary) peri-operative practices and their own initiative in following poorly explained pre-operative instructions. The quality and efficiency of any subsequent SSI treatment similarly rests on a seemingly inconsistent approach with poor patient instruction for the post-discharge setting. Surgical site infection risk can be mitigated successfully through reliable performance of several evidence-based process measures within the operating room, which are now at the guideline level. However, optimal performance only happens when teams and patients are aligned and truly believe both that the evidence is correct, and that SSIs are preventable. The journey toward this goal will be an iterative process that may take months to years. Although technology can be complementary, it cannot replace human passion for harm prevention.