Predictors of Adverse Events Following Cleft Palate Repair

Elbert Johann Mets1, Fouad Chouairi, Sina John Torabi

  • 1Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New Haven, CT.

Insights

Adverse events after cleft palate repair are rare but serious. Systemic diseases like lung and neurological conditions, along with blood transfusions, significantly increase risks for complications and reoperation.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Craniofacial Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Cleft palate repair, while common, carries rare but severe risks.
  • Identifying risk factors is crucial for surgical planning and patient counseling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify risk factors associated with adverse events following primary cleft palate repair in pediatric patients.
  • To inform surgical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of pediatric patients under 2 years old undergoing primary cleft palate repair from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Pediatric Database (NSQIP-P) between 2012 and 2016.
  • Multivariate analysis to determine predictors of adverse events, including wound dehiscence, reoperation, and 30-day readmission.

Main Results:

  • Out of 4989 patients, 6.4% experienced adverse events. Key predictors included perioperative blood transfusion (aOR 30.2), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (aOR 2.2), and prolonged length of stay (aOR 1.1).
  • Reoperation was strongly linked to perioperative blood transfusion (aOR 286.5) and cerebral palsy (aOR 11.3).
  • Thirty-day readmission was associated with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cerebral palsy, and prolonged LOS.

Conclusions:

  • Systemic diseases, particularly neurological and pulmonary conditions, are significant predictors of readmission and reoperation after cleft palate repair.
  • Intraoperative blood transfusions represent a major surgical risk factor for post-operative complications.
  • Risk stratification and targeted interventions for high-risk patients are essential.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview
43.5K
Overview of DNA Repair02:25

Overview of DNA Repair

In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
33.5K
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
26.1K
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:08

Nucleotide Excision Repair

Overview
40.6K
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects01:12

Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects

While local anesthetics are generally safe and well-tolerated, they can occasionally cause adverse effects that vary in severity. Local anesthetics can induce toxicity at two distinct levels. They can either produce local effects through direct contact with the neural elements or be absorbed into the bloodstream from the injection site, leading to systemic effects.
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
772
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.9K