Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Adverse effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met met/met genotype in methamphetamine-related executive
Mariana Cherner1, Caitlin W-M Watson1, Rowan Saloner1
1Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, United States.
Introduction:
The Val allele of the Val158Met single-nucleotide polymorphism of the catechol-o-methyltransferase gene (COMT) confers greater catabolism of dopamine (DA) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) than the Met allele. Met/Met homozygotes typically outperform Val-carriers on tests of executive function (EF), perhaps resulting from increased DA bioavailability. Methamphetamine (METH) causes large releases of DA, which is associated with neurotoxicity and executive dysfunction in chronic METH users. We hypothesized that, contrary to its effect in non-METH-using populations, slower DA clearance conferred by Met/Met will relate to worse EF in METH users.
Methods:
149 non-Hispanic White men, stratified by METH dependence (METH+/-) and COMT (Val/Val, Val/Met, Met/Met), completed three tests of EF: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Stroop Color-Word Test (Stroop), and Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B). Demographically-adjusted test scores were averaged to create an EF composite T-score. We examined the interaction of METH and COMT on the EF composite and individual test T-scores, controlling for premorbid functioning and alcohol use.
Results:
METH group differences in EF were evident only among Met/Met carriers (beta = -9.36, p < .001) but not among Val carriers: Val/Met (beta = -1.38, p = .44) and Val/Val (beta = -4.34, p = .10). These effects were most salient on the WCST.
Conclusions:
In the pre-frontal hyperdopaminergic state triggered by methamphetamine, greater DA inactivation conferred by the Val allele may protect against METH-related executive dysfunction, suggesting genetically-driven differences in vulnerability to METH.
More Related Videos
12:36In vitro tRNA Methylation Assay with the Entamoeba histolytica DNA and tRNA Methyltransferase Dnmt2 Ehmeth Enzyme
Published on: October 19, 2010
09:16A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
Published on: January 22, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Threats to Biodiversity
The Small x Assumption
What is Natural Selection?