Acetic acid versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled...

The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the efficacy of percutaneous acetic acid (PAAI) to that of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of small (≤5cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a randomized trial.

Consecutive patients with small HCC underwent clinical, biochemical, and imaging evaluation. Those fulfilling the inclusion criteria (Child's A/B cirrhosis, less than 5 HCC nodules, HCC nodules≤5cm diameter, no extrahepatic disease, patent portal vein, normal coagulation profile with informed consent) were randomly assigned to receive RFA or PAAI. Tumor response and survival rate were estimated. Non-inferiority margin of 10% difference was taken for effectivity of PAAI compared to RFA.

Of the 86 patients screened, 55 patients with 67 HCC nodules were included. There were 40 men and 15 women with a mean age of 54.3±10.5 (SD) years (range: 28-71years). Of these, 26 patients had PAAI and 29 had RFA. The clinical, demographic and imaging profiles of the two groups were similar. Complete response was non-inferior to RFA [PAAI 75% and RFA 83.3%, difference 8.3% CI (-12.5% to 29.2%)]. Lower limit of this 95% CI (-12.5%) was lower than the 10% non-inferiority margin difference (8.3%). Survival rates were similar at 12months (PAAI, 81.6% vs. RFA, 71.9%; P=0.68) and at 30months (PAAI, 54.4% vs. RFA, 52%; P=0.50).

PAAI and RFA have similar efficacy in treating small HCC. PAAI could thus be a cost-effective alternative in situations where RFA is either unavailable or unaffordable.