Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Vein Interposition Model: A Suitable Model to Study Bypass Graft Patency
Published on: January 15, 2017
Influence of artery and vein diameters on autogenous arteriovenous access patency
Jonathan Misskey1, Ramin Hamidizadeh2, Jason Faulds3
1Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Alberta, Canada; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Alberta, Canada.
Objective:
Previous investigations have suggested that a minimum venous outflow diameter (MVOD) and perianastomotic arterial diameter are associated with successful autogenous arteriovenous maturation and patency. The goal of this study was to determine anatomic and clinical variables that may influence access patency to guide optimal autogenous access configuration selection.
Methods:
Accesses created from 2010 to 2016 were analyzed from data entered into a prospective database. Preprocedure duplex ultrasound mapping data of artery and tourniquet-derived vein diameters and demographic and clinical variables were collected. Survival-based cut point analysis was used to determine anatomic parameters most predictive of access failure. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess patencies and maturation and to identify independent predictors of access failure.
Results:
A total of 356 first-time autogenous accesses were created (median follow-up, 20 months; range, 0-73 months). Of these, 202 (56.7%) were radiocephalic and 154 (43.3%) were brachiocephalic. Maturation failure at end of follow-up for arteriovenous accesses was 26% ± 3% for radiocephalic accesses and 15% ± 3% for brachiocephalic accesses (P < .001). For radiocephalic accesses, MVOD <3.0 mm and radial artery diameter <2.1 mm independently predicted access maturation failure (MVOD <3.0 mm: hazard ratio [HR], 2.62 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27-5.39; P = .009]; radial artery diameter <2.1 mm: HR, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.20-4.05; P = .011]) and secondary patency loss (MVOD <3.0 mm: HR, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.24-3.96; P = .007]; radial artery diameter <2.1 mm: HR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.26-3.63; P = .004]). A combination of radial artery diameter <2.1 mm and MVOD <3.0 mm most strongly predicted maturation failure (HR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.71-10.49; P = .002) and loss of secondary patency (HR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.88-8.64; P < .001). Only diabetes mellitus (HR, 2.24; P = .012) predicted secondary patency loss. For brachiocephalic accesses, MVOD <3.4 mm (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.02-4.46; P = .043) was found to independently predict secondary patency loss in addition to previous ipsilateral (HR, 2.37; P = .038) and bilateral (HR, 4.00; P = .015) tunneled hemodialysis catheters. Brachial artery diameter was not associated with either access maturation or patency.
Conclusions:
Artery and tourniquet-derived vein diameters independently predict radiocephalic access patency and functional outcomes. A combination of a radial artery diameter <2.1 mm and MVOD <3.0 mm best predicts maturation failure and patency loss for radiocephalic access. MVOD <3.4 mm was associated with increased loss of brachiocephalic access secondary patency, but MVOD was not associated with maturation.
Related Concept Videos
Veins
Structure of Veins:
The structure of veins is specifically designed to assist in the low-pressure transportation of...
Design Example: Calculating Safe Diameter for Wind-Exposed Disc
Veins of Thorax
The azygos vein, positioned just right of the midline and anterior to the vertebral column, begins at the junction of the right ascending lumbar and subcostal veins, terminating in the superior vena cava. This vein drains blood from the right side of the thoracic wall, thoracic viscera, and posterior abdominal wall.
The...
Veins of Lower Limbs
Formed by the union of the medial and lateral plantar veins, the posterior tibial vein, rising through the calf muscle, assimilates the fibular vein. The anterior tibial vein, a superior extension of the foot's dorsalis pedis vein, merges with the posterior tibial vein at the...
Bioavailability: Influencing Factors
The Influence of Affect on Cognition

