Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015
A comparison of Icare PRO and Perkins tonometers in anesthetized children
Massimiliano Serafino1, Edoardo Villani1, Andrea Lembo2
1Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Eye Clinic San Giuseppe Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Multimedica, University of Milan, Via San Vittore, 12, 20123, Milan, Italy.
Insights
The Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT) shows higher reliability for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in children compared to the Icare PRO (ICP). Both devices demonstrated a significant correlation between IOP and central corneal thickness (CCT).
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Eye Care
- Ophthalmic Instrumentation
Background:
- Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is critical in pediatric ophthalmology, particularly in aphakic or strabismus patients.
- Existing tonometers may have limitations in accuracy and reliability in pediatric populations.
- Central corneal thickness (CCT) is a known factor influencing IOP readings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare IOP measurements between the Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT) and Icare PRO (ICP) in anesthetized children.
- To evaluate intra-operator and inter-operator reliability for both tonometer devices.
- To assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements obtained by PAT and ICP.
Main Methods:
- Seventy children undergoing examination under anesthesia were included.
- IOP was measured twice with PAT and ICP by two operators on each eye.
- Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using ultrasound pachymetry; Bland-Altman analyses and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used for evaluation.
Main Results:
- The Icare PRO (ICP) tended to overestimate IOP compared to the Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT), with a mean difference of 1.97 mmHg.
- Repeatability and reproducibility were higher for PAT (repeatability 0.96, reproducibility 0.76) than for ICP (repeatability 0.81, reproducibility 0.70).
- A significant correlation (r=0.66) was found between IOP and CCT for both instruments.
Conclusions:
- The Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT) demonstrates superior repeatability and reproducibility for IOP measurements in pediatric patients compared to the Icare PRO (ICP).
- ICP tends to overestimate IOP relative to PAT in this cohort.
- Both tonometers showed a significant correlation with central corneal thickness (CCT), highlighting its importance in IOP assessment.
Aim:
To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Perkins applanation tonometer and Icare PRO (ICP) rebound tonometer in anesthetized aphakic or strabismus children. Furthermore, intra-operator correlation and inter-operator correlation have been evaluated, along with the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements.
Methods:
Seventy children undergoing examination under anesthesia with sevoflurane for aphakic patients and for surgery for strabismus were included. IOP have been measured twice immediately after anesthesia induction with both Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT) and ICP in one eye and by two different operators with both devices in the fellow eye. Furthermore, CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry Pacline (Optikon). Agreement between the device measurements has been evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. Repeatability and reproducibility of the device have been evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a value > 0.75 associated with excellent reliability. The relationship between IOP and CCT has been evaluated with Spearman's correlation coefficient r and determination coefficient r2.
Results:
Mean difference in IOP measurements between ICP and PAT was 1.97 mmHg ± 1.23 mmHg (p < 0.05). This difference appeared to be higher in aphakic patients (mean difference 2.15 ± 1.35) than in patients undergoing strabismus surgery (mean difference 1.83 mmHg ± 1.12). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is used to evaluate repeatability and reproducibility, which are both high for PAT (repeatability 0.96, reproducibility 0.76) compared with ICP (repeatability 0.81, reproducibility 0.70). Correlation coefficient between CCT and IOP is 0.66 for both ICP and PAT.
Conclusion:
ICP tends to overestimate IOP compared to PAT. Repeatability and reproducibility are both high for PAT as compared to ICP. A significant correlation between IOP and CCT for both instruments has been demonstrated.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Local Anesthetics: Mechanism of Action
Local anesthetics are amphiphilic molecules consisting of a hydrophobic aromatic part linked to a hydrophilic group by an ester or amide linkage. They are weak bases and are usually available as salts, which increases their solubility and stability. Once administered, LAs exist in the body either...

