Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

An Orthotopic Mouse Model of Spontaneous Breast Cancer Metastasis
Published on: August 14, 2016
Diffusion gradient nonlinearity bias correction reduces bias of breast cancer bone metastasis ADC values
Thomas W Buus1, Anders B Jensen2, Erik M Pedersen1
1The Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Contract Grant Sponsor:
Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region.
Background:
Diffusion gradient nonlinearity (DGNL) bias causes apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to drop with increasing superior-inferior (SI) isocenter offset. This is a concern when performing quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
Purpose/Hypothesis:
To investigate if DGNL ADC bias can be corrected in breast cancer bone metastases using a clinical DWI protocol and an online correction algorithm.
Study Type:
Prospective.
Subjects/Phantom:
A diffusion phantom (Model 128, High Precision Devices, Boulder, CO) was used for in vitro validation. Twenty-three women with bone-metastasizing breast cancer were enrolled to assess DGNL correction in vivo.
Field Strength/Sequence:
DWI was performed on a 1.5T MRI system as single-shot, spin-echo, echo-planar imaging with short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) fat-saturation. ADC maps with and without DGNL correction were created from the b50 and b800 images.
Assessment:
Uncorrected and DGNL-corrected ADC values were measured in phantom and bone metastases by placing regions of interest on b800 images and copying them to the ADC map. The SI offset was recorded.
Statistical Tests:
In all, 79 bone metastases were assessed. ADC values with and without DGNL correction were compared at 14 cm SI offset using a two-tailed t-test.
Results:
In the diffusion phantom, DGNL correction increased SI offset, where ADC bias was lower than 5%, from 7.3-13.8 cm. Of the 23 patients examined, six had no metastases in the covered regions. In the remaining patients, bias of uncorrected bone metastasis ADC values was 19.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.4-22.9%) at 14 cm SI offset. After DGNL correction, ADC bias was significantly reduced to 3.5% (95% CI: 0.7-6.3%, P < 0.001), thus reducing bias due to DGNL by 82%.
Data Conclusion:
Online DGNL correction corrects DGNL ADC value bias and allows increased station lengths in the SI direction.
Level Of Evidence:
2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:904-911.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Diode: Forward bias
The behavior of a diode in forward bias...
Biasing of FET
In an N-channel JFET, the structure consists of N-type material forming the channel on a P-type substrate, with the...
Biasing of P-N Junction
In equilibrium, no external voltage is applied across the p-n junction. The depletion region is formed at the junction interface due to the diffusion of carriers, which leaves behind charged dopants, acceptors on the p-side, and donors on the n-side. These immobile charges create an electric field that prevents further diffusion of carriers. The related energy band...

