[Study on commutability evaluation of reference materials for fibrinogen]

Objective: To discuss the commutability evaluation method of reference materials for fibrinogen measurement and evaluate the commutability of the Third WHO International Standard Fibrinogen Plasma (WHO 09/264), SSC/ISTH Secondary Coagulation Standard (SSC LOT4) and homemade reference materials (RM01, RM02) in order to provide suggestions on how to determine the suitable method of commutability evaluation and reliable traceability standard. Methods: The comparability of fibrinogen among different measurement systems were evaluated and WHO 09/264 was used to calibrate each system to improve the comparability if the comparability among different systems couldn't be accepted. Forty clinical samples and the reference materials randomly interspersed among the clinical samples were measured on Stago STA-R Evolution, Sysmex CS 5100, IL ACL TOP 700 simultaneously. Measurement results were pairwise analyzed by Deming regression and difference in bias approach according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP14-A3 protocol and the recommendations of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) working group on commutability, respectively. Results: The comparability of fibrinogen measurement among common systems could not meet the criterion. WHO 09/264 could improve the agreement among different measurement systems. The prediction interval of Deming regression was affected by the comparability of measurement systems, resulting in unreliable results. The difference in bias approach was more suitable because its criterion was related to the medical requirements. WHO 09/264 was commutable between Stago and Sysmex, inconclusive between Stago and IL, Sysmex and IL (The calibration effectiveness of WHO 09/264 showed that it was commutable among the three measurement systems). SSC LOT4 was commutable between Stago and Sysmex, inconclusive between Stago and IL, Sysmex and IL. RM01 and RM02 were commutable between all systems pairs assessed by difference in bias approach. Conclusions: There are differences in the results of two commutability evaluation approaches. The difference in bias approach is recommended for commutability evaluation. WHO International Standard and homemade reference materials can be used as traceability standard for fibrinogen measurement.