Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

414
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
414
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

64.8K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
64.8K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

65.5K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
65.5K
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

361
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
361
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond analogy: Pragmatic constraints on metaphor production and comprehension.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Enhancing visuospatial mapping in relational category learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Advancing with age: Older adults excel in comprehension of novel metaphors.

Psychology and aging·2024
Same author

Cognitive complexity explains processing asymmetry in judgments of similarity versus difference.

Cognitive psychology·2024
Same author

Two Computational Approaches to Visual Analogy: Task-Specific Models Versus Domain-General Mapping.

Cognitive science·2023
Same author

Zero-shot visual reasoning through probabilistic analogical mapping.

Nature communications·2023
Same journal

The properties of personal semantics.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.7K

Individual differences in relational reasoning.

Maureen E Gray1, Keith J Holyoak2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, 405 Hilgard Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1563, USA. maureengray@ucla.edu.

Memory & Cognition
|July 19, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found that while relational processing is linked to cognitive capacity, individual differences in cognitive style do not significantly predict relational reasoning abilities beyond cognitive capacity itself. Understanding these cognitive prerequisites is key.

Keywords:
Cognitive capacityCognitive styleIndividual differencesRelational reasoning

More Related Videos

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

926
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.7K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

926
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Individual Differences Research

Background:

  • Relational processing is associated with cognitive capacity measures like working memory and fluid intelligence.
  • The extent to which different relational processing forms share common factors and the role of cognitive style remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the prerequisites for relational processing using an individual-differences approach.
  • To determine if cognitive style contributes to variations in relational reasoning beyond cognitive capacity.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies were conducted with college students.
  • Participants completed tests of fluid intelligence, cognitive style, and relational reasoning tasks.

Main Results:

  • Moderate correlations were observed between relational processing and cognitive capacity measures.
  • Cognitive style measures did not significantly enhance the prediction of relational processing beyond cognitive capacity.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive capacity is a primary predictor of relational processing abilities.
  • Cognitive style appears to play a limited role in explaining individual differences in relational reasoning.