Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Correlations02:20

Correlations

35.8K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
35.8K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

56.9K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
56.9K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

9.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

42.1K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
42.1K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preliminary effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation combined with virtual reality-based cycling training on upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy: a double-blind randomized crossover trial.

BMC neurology·2026
Same author

Motor differences in jumping among children with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same author

Enhancing cancer vaccine efficacy via electrostatic engineering of an FcγR-targeted protein.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes From 6 Weeks of Home-Based Kinesio Taping and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Combined With Self-Applied Myofascial Stretching in Adults With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research·2026
Same author

Hyperspectral reconstruction of white light endoscopy images for enhanced segmentation of early esophageal lesions in patients.

iScience·2026
Same author

Inhibition of mitochondrial ROS turns LC3-associated phagocytosis to autophagy upon resveratrol treatment for group A Streptococcus clearance in endothelial cells.

Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Advanced Diffusion Imaging in The Hippocampus of Rats with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
10:33

Advanced Diffusion Imaging in The Hippocampus of Rats with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: August 14, 2019

9.0K

Neural Correlates of Response Inhibition and Error Processing in Individuals with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An

I-Hsuan Shen1,2, Ying-Ju Lin1,3, Chia-Ling Chen2,4

  • 1Department of Occupational Therapy, Graduate Institute of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Journal of Neurotrauma
|July 19, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) exhibit impaired inhibitory control and error processing, as evidenced by behavioral and electrophysiological markers. These executive function deficits persist months after injury, highlighting the need for sensitive diagnostic tools.

Keywords:
Stop-signal taskerror processingevent-related potentialmild traumatic brain injuryresponse inhibition

More Related Videos

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats
07:36

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats

Published on: December 8, 2014

24.3K
Electromagnetic Controlled Closed-Head Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice
09:07

Electromagnetic Controlled Closed-Head Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice

Published on: September 28, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Advanced Diffusion Imaging in The Hippocampus of Rats with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
10:33

Advanced Diffusion Imaging in The Hippocampus of Rats with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: August 14, 2019

9.0K
A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats
07:36

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats

Published on: December 8, 2014

24.3K
Electromagnetic Controlled Closed-Head Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice
09:07

Electromagnetic Controlled Closed-Head Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice

Published on: September 28, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Neurology

Background:

  • Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) frequently leads to executive control deficits.
  • The neural underpinnings of these deficits, particularly in inhibitory control and cognitive monitoring, remain unclear.
  • Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for effective diagnosis and rehabilitation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate executive control deficits in individuals with mTBI using the Stop-signal task.
  • To compare behavioral performance and event-related potential (ERP) correlates of response inhibition and error processing between mTBI patients and controls.
  • To identify electrophysiological markers indicative of cognitive dysfunction after mTBI.

Main Methods:

  • Recruited 18 adults with mTBI and 18 matched controls.
  • Administered the Stop-signal task to assess inhibitory control and error processing.
  • Analyzed behavioral data (inhibition probability, reaction times) and ERPs (N1, N2, P3 amplitudes and latencies).

Main Results:

  • The mTBI group showed reduced inhibition probability and longer stop-signal reaction times.
  • ERP analysis revealed differences in N2 amplitude and P3 modulation between groups and trial types.
  • mTBI patients exhibited longer error positivity latency, indicating inefficient error processing.

Conclusions:

  • Inhibitory control and error processing are demonstrably inefficient in individuals with mTBI, even beyond three months post-injury.
  • Electrophysiological markers, such as ERP components, serve as sensitive indicators of executive dysfunction following mTBI.
  • These findings support the use of neurophysiological assessments for diagnosing and monitoring cognitive impairments after mild traumatic brain injury.