Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.0K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.2K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

18.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
18.4K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.0K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.0K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

11.0K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
11.0K
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection01:26

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection

13.3K
The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
13.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differential DNA methylation in blood as potential mediator of the association between ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease among a cognitively normal population-based cohort.

Molecular psychiatry·2026
Same author

Association between maternal organophosphate esters metabolite levels during pregnancy and internalizing and externalizing behaviors in children at 2-5 years.

Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

The joint effects of exposure to prenatal pesticides and psychosocial factors on epigenetic age acceleration in the first 5 years of life in a South African birth cohort.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Effects of FKBP5 on Stroke Outcome in Mice and Men: A Translational Study.

Stroke·2026
Same author

Genome-wide association study of major anxiety disorders in 122,341 European-ancestry cases identifies 58 loci and highlights GABAergic signaling.

Nature genetics·2026
Same author

Evaluating Methods for High-Dimensional Mediation in Metabolomics Data.

Environmental science & technology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
12:11

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

13.9K

Methodological challenges in constructing DNA methylation risk scores.

Anke Hüls1,2, Darina Czamara3

  • 1Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Epigenetics
|July 19, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Methylation risk scores (MRS) adapt genetic risk score (GRS) methods for DNA methylation data. While promising for complex traits and disease prediction, challenges exist in finding appropriate external weights due to data sensitivity.

Keywords:
Polygenic epidemiologyepigenetic risk scoregenetic risk scorespolygenic risk scoresprediction modelsweighting strategies

More Related Videos

Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation
21:24

Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation

Published on: January 2, 2009

24.1K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

38.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
12:11

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

13.9K
Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation
21:24

Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation

Published on: January 2, 2009

24.1K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

38.0K

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics and Genomics
  • Complex Trait Analysis
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • Polygenic approaches using genetic risk scores (GRS) explain more complex trait variance than single-variant methods.
  • GRS are established tools for risk prediction, association, and interaction studies with genotype data.
  • Growing interest in applying GRS principles to DNA methylation data, termed methylation risk scores (MRS).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the adaptation of existing GRS methodologies to DNA methylation data.
  • To highlight the potential applications of MRS in various biological and clinical research areas.
  • To identify and discuss the challenges encountered when developing and applying MRS.

Main Methods:

  • Direct transfer of established GRS methodologies to DNA methylation data.
  • Exploration of MRS applications including biomarker analysis, association studies, and risk prediction.
  • Identification of confounding factors (e.g., age, tissue type) impacting MRS development.

Main Results:

  • Most GRS approaches are transferable to methylation data, enabling the creation of MRS.
  • MRS offer potential for environmental exposure biomarker identification and association analyses.
  • Challenges arise in obtaining appropriate external weights for MRS due to methylation data's sensitivity to confounders.

Conclusions:

  • Methylation risk scores (MRS) represent a promising extension of polygenic approaches to epigenomic data.
  • MRS can serve as valuable tools for disease risk prediction, biomarker discovery, and complex trait analysis.
  • Addressing confounding factors is crucial for the robust development and application of MRS.