Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Standard Operating Procedure for Lyssavirus Surveillance of the Bat Population in Taiwan
Published on: August 27, 2019
Standardization of State Definitions for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Surveillance and the Opioid Crisis
Katelyn V Chiang1, Ekwutosi M Okoroh1, Laurin J Kasehagen1
1At the time of the writing of this article, Katelyn V. Chiang, Ekwutosi M. Okoroh, Laurin J. Kasehagen, and Jean Y. Ko were with the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Ekwutosi M. Okoroh and Jean Y. Ko are with the US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Rockville, MD. Laurin J. Kasehagen is with the Vermont Department of Health and Vermont Department of Mental Health, Burlington. Luigi F. Garcia-Saavedra is with the New Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe.
Insights
Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) rates have surged, leading to varied state definitions for tracking this opioid crisis impact. Standardizing these definitions is crucial for accurate national estimates and effective infant intervention strategies.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Neonatal Medicine
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) rates have increased fivefold over the past decade.
- The opioid crisis has led to diverse state-level approaches to managing newborns affected by substance exposure.
- Variability in quantifying NAS burden hinders effective public health responses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To summarize and analyze clinical case and surveillance definitions of NAS across US jurisdictions.
- To understand the heterogeneity in NAS identification processes.
- To highlight the need for standardized definitions to improve data comparability.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of clinical case definitions for NAS.
- Analysis of surveillance definitions and diagnosis codes used across states.
- Comparison of identification methods for NAS.
Main Results:
- Heterogeneous processes for identifying NAS were confirmed, driven by the opioid crisis.
- Clinical case definitions vary in their use of observed withdrawal signs and perinatal exposure evidence.
- Discordance in diagnosis codes used for surveillance definitions was observed.
Conclusions:
- Variability in NAS definitions complicates the production of comparable jurisdictional estimates.
- Standardized NAS definitions are essential for guiding national public health strategies and interventions.
- Consistent definitions will enhance comparability and improve prevention and treatment efforts for affected mothers and infants.
Abstract:
Rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) have increased fivefold in the past decade. To address this expanding and complex issue, state public health agencies have addressed the opioid crisis affecting newborns in diverse ways, leading to a variety of methods to quantify the burden of NAS.In an effort to understand this variability, we summarized clinical case and surveillance definitions used across jurisdictions in the United States. We confirmed that the rapid progression of the nation's opioid crisis resulted in heterogeneous processes for identifying NAS. Current clinical case definitions use different combinations of clinician-observed signs of withdrawal and evidence of perinatal substance exposure. Similarly, there is discordance in diagnosis codes used in surveillance definitions. This variability makes it difficult to produce comparable estimates across jurisdictions, which are needed to effectively guide public health strategies and interventions.Although standardization is complicated, consistent NAS definitions would increase comparability of NAS estimates across the nation and would better guide prevention and treatment efforts for women and their infants.
Related Concept Videos
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Opioid Receptors: Overview
Definite Integral
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Definition of z-Transform
Properties of Definite Integral I

