Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes TILLING Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis
Published on: July 16, 2019
Problem formulation and phenotypic characterisation for the development of novel crops
1Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Rosentalstrasse 67, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. alan.raybould@syngenta.com.
Phenotypic characterisation for novel crops is crucial for product development and risk assessment. This study argues that profiling is an inefficient method for risk assessment, advocating for a return to problem formulation principles.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Biotechnology
- Genetics
Background:
- Phenotypic characterisation is vital for novel crop development, informing technical and commercial decisions.
- It involves product characterisation (verifying intended traits and absence of adverse unintended changes) and risk assessment (evaluating potential harm to health or environment).
- Current practices, especially with new plant breeding methods like gene editing, often deviate from established problem formulation principles in risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the effectiveness of profiling methods in phenotypic characterisation for risk assessment of novel crops.
- To argue that profiling is an inefficient and ineffective approach for risk assessment.
- To clarify and correct misconceptions regarding problem formulation in the context of novel crop development and risk assessment.
Main Methods:
- The paper reviews the principles of problem formulation as applied to product characterisation and risk assessment.
- It contrasts these principles with current practices in phenotypic characterisation, particularly the use of profiling for unintended changes.
- The study analyzes the reasons behind the preference for profiling methods.
Main Results:
- Profiling methods, used to catalogue all unintended changes in novel crops, are demonstrated to be inefficient and ineffective for risk assessment.
- The current approach often bypasses the crucial step of setting clear criteria for acceptable risk.
- Misconceptions about problem formulation contribute to the reliance on inefficient profiling techniques.
Conclusions:
- Phenotypic characterisation for risk assessment should adhere to problem formulation principles, focusing on predefined criteria for unacceptable risk.
- Profiling is not an optimal strategy for identifying and evaluating significant unintended changes.
- A return to rigorous problem formulation is necessary for robust and efficient risk assessment in novel crop development, especially with advanced breeding technologies.
Related Concept Videos
Sustainable Development
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Moment of a Force: Scalar Formulation
Consider a simple example of a flywheel being rotated about a point, O, by applying a force to it. In this case, the moment arm is the perpendicular distance between the point O and the line of action of the force. The...
Resultant Moment: Scalar Formulation
To determine the resultant moment, the moments caused by all the forces in a system in the x-y plane are considered. Positive moments are typically...
Moment of a Force: Vector Formulation
The vector formulation of the moment of force is the cross-product of the position and force vectors. The...

