Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Support From a Layperson During a Woman's First Two Births

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and health outcomes related to continuous support from a layperson during a woman's first two births in a theoretical population.

Cost-effectiveness analysis.

A theoretical cohort of 1.2 million women based on an approximation of annual low-risk, nulliparous, term, singleton births in the United States with the assumption that these women have second births. This reflects the average number of births per woman in the United States.

We designed a cost-effectiveness model to compare outcomes in women with continuous support from relatives, friends, or community members with minimal to no training (excluding trained doulas) during labor and birth compared with outcomes for women with no continuous support. Outcomes included mode of birth, uterine rupture, hysterectomy, maternal death, cost, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We derived probabilities from the literature and set a cost-effectiveness threshold at $100,000/QALY.

In this theoretical model, continuous support by a layperson during the first birth resulted in fewer cesarean births, decreased costs, and increased QALYs for the first and subsequent births. Women with support from laypersons had 71,090 fewer cesarean births, 35 fewer uterine ruptures, 9 fewer hysterectomies, and 16 fewer maternal deaths, which saved $364 million with 2,673 increased QALYs. Sensitivity analyses showed that continuous support in the first birth was cost-effective even when varying the estimate of lost wages of the support person up to $708.

Continuous labor support from a layperson leads to fewer cesarean births, improved outcomes, decreased costs, and increased QALYs. This highlights the need to increase women's access to continuous layperson support during labor and birth uninhibited by financial and institutional barriers.