Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
Published on: March 13, 2018
Saccade variability in healthy subjects and cerebellar patients
Thomas Eggert1, Andreas Straube1
1Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Abstract:
In a previous study we developed a model for the inter-trial variance of saccade trajectories in the rhesus macaque. The analysis of that model showed that signal-dependent noise results in different effector variabilities depending on whether the noise is propagated feedforward through the system (accumulating noise) or whether the noise originates from inside of a premotor feedback loop (feedback noise). This allowed the gain of the premotor feedback loop to be estimated directly from behavioral data. In the present study, we applied the model in healthy human subjects and in patients with chronic isolated cerebellar lesions due to ischemic stroke. Humans showed smaller noise coefficients of variation for both accumulating noise and feedback noise and smaller feedback gain than the monkeys. Despite these differences in the model parameters, the qualitative differences between the two noise types were similar in both species. Cerebellar patients showed larger inter-trial variance of saccade amplitude compared to controls, but saccade metrics and dynamics were well compensated. The parameters of the noise model did not differ significantly between groups. The variance of the saccade amplitude correlated highly (r=0.95) with the coefficient of variation of accumulating noise but not with the other model parameters. The results suggest that the cerebellum plays a role not only in premotor feedback but also in feedforward saccade control and that the latter is responsible for increased endpoint variance in cerebellar patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Cable Subjected to Its Own Weight
A generalized loading function is employed to analyze a cable subjected to its own weight. This function considers the force acting along the cable's arc length rather than its projected length, providing a more accurate...
Work and Energy for Variable Forces

