Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

5.0K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
5.0K
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Elimination Rate Constant, Half-Life and Volume of Distribution01:09

One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Elimination Rate Constant, Half-Life and Volume of Distribution

862
The one-compartment open model is a simplified approach used in pharmacokinetics to understand the distribution and elimination of a drug administered through an intravenous bolus. This model assumes rapid drug dispersal throughout the body and elimination using a first-order process. Key pharmacokinetic parameters, such as the elimination rate constant (k), half-life (t1/2), and the apparent volume of distribution (Vd), can be estimated from this model. The elimination rate is calculated...
862
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

244
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
244
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

4.5K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.5K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.1K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.1K
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

8.2K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
8.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain activity during acquisition of long visuospatial sequences.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Is achieving higher standards in real-world migraine care feasible with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies preventive therapies?: Insights from the EUREkA cohort.

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache·2026
Same author

Long-Term Effectiveness and Persistence Factors of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine: 2-Year Results From the EUREkA Cohort.

Neurology·2026
Same author

The Role of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide in High-Altitude Headache: A Prospective Field Study.

Annals of clinical and translational neurology·2026
Same author

[Headache after vaccination - always harmless?]

MMW Fortschritte der Medizin·2026
Same author

Clinical Manifestations of Primary CNS T-Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective Study of Histopathologic, Molecular, and Neuroimaging Features.

Neurology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Tool for Electrochemical Rate Constant Estimation
08:41

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Tool for Electrochemical Rate Constant Estimation

Published on: October 10, 2018

25.8K

Improving the repeatability of two-rate model parameter estimations by using autoencoder networks.

Murat C Ozdemir1, Thomas Eggert1, Andreas Straube1

  • 1Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Progress in Brain Research
|July 22, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study shows that autoencoder networks (AE) effectively clean visuomotor adaptation data, reducing individual parameter variance. AE methods improve parameter estimation compared to traditional techniques.

Keywords:
AutoencoderData cleaningHumanTwo-rate modelsVisuomotor adaptation

More Related Videos

Laboratory and Field Protocol for Estimating Sheet Erosion Rates from Dendrogeomorphology
07:20

Laboratory and Field Protocol for Estimating Sheet Erosion Rates from Dendrogeomorphology

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.2K
Estimating Virus Production Rates in Aquatic Systems
10:49

Estimating Virus Production Rates in Aquatic Systems

Published on: September 22, 2010

13.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Tool for Electrochemical Rate Constant Estimation
08:41

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Tool for Electrochemical Rate Constant Estimation

Published on: October 10, 2018

25.8K
Laboratory and Field Protocol for Estimating Sheet Erosion Rates from Dendrogeomorphology
07:20

Laboratory and Field Protocol for Estimating Sheet Erosion Rates from Dendrogeomorphology

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.2K
Estimating Virus Production Rates in Aquatic Systems
10:49

Estimating Virus Production Rates in Aquatic Systems

Published on: September 22, 2010

13.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Visuomotor adaptation is typically modeled using two-rate models at the group level.
  • Individual parameter estimation in these models suffers from significant variance.
  • Traditional data cleaning methods may struggle with the non-smooth nature of rapid adaptive changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of various data cleaning methods on parameter estimation in visuomotor adaptation.
  • To evaluate the performance of an autoencoder network (AE) against conventional cleaning techniques.
  • To assess the reduction in within-subject variance, particularly for the fast retention rate (af).

Main Methods:

  • Collected time-series data from a visuomotor adaptation experimental paradigm with repeated training.
  • Applied several data cleaning methods, including moving average, piecewise polynomials, and an autoencoder network (AE).
  • Compared parameter estimation and within-subject variance across different cleaning methods and training repetitions.

Main Results:

  • The autoencoder network (AE) demonstrated superior performance overall compared to other methods.
  • AE did not introduce an underestimation bias on the parameter bf, unlike moving average and piecewise polynomial methods.
  • AE significantly reduced within-subject variance, with a reduction of over 50% for the fast retention rate (af).

Conclusions:

  • Autoencoder networks offer a robust solution for cleaning visuomotor adaptation data, enhancing parameter estimation accuracy.
  • AE methods mitigate the issue of high variance in individual parameters, improving model reliability.
  • The application of AE in analyzing adaptation data can lead to more precise understanding of learning dynamics, especially rapid changes.