Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
Published on: May 10, 2017
Clinical outcomes of closed-loop vagal nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy
Michal Tzadok1, Amit Harush2, Andrea Nissenkorn1
1Pediatric Neurology Unit, Edmond and Lili Safra Children's Hospital, The Haim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan Israel; Sackler school of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Purpose:
The AspireSR® is a vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) device that operates as a closed-loop system, delivering an automatic stimulation in response to an ictal heart rate increase that serves as a predictor for an imminent seizure. Our purpose is to assess the outcome of the AspireSR® in a patient population managed in a pediatric neurology unit.
Methods:
The records of patients who underwent transplantation during 2015-2017 and are continuously followed in one pediatric-epilepsy clinic, were retrospectively analyzed. Collected information included demographics, use of antiepileptic drugs and seizure type, frequency and duration before and after VNS implantation.
Results:
46 patients ages 5-31 years (mean 15.7 ± 5.8), mean age at implantation 14 ± 5.8 years, were included. 29 patients (63%) were new insertions and 17 of the patients (37%) underwent a VNS replacement to the AspireSR® model. Mean follow-up was 13 ± 7.5 months (range 2-29 months). The total cohort responder rate (patients with ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared to the pre-implantation period) was 60.9%. (62% in the new insertion group; while 59% in the replacement group had additional benefit over their former VNS model, p = 0.981). Epilepsy etiology, age, age at implantation and type of seizures pre-implantation showed no correlation to response-rate. Five patients (10.9%) experienced complete seizure-freedom following implantation (4/5 in the "new insertion" group). Responses were reported at median follow up of 5 ± 1.3 months post-implantation. 67.4% experienced shorter seizure duration post-implantation.
Conclusion:
Our results suggest that the AspireSR® device provides an early and meaningful benefit to drug-resistant epilepsy patients, which is relevant for both patients with new insertions and those with replacements of former VNS devices.
More Related Videos
09:32Network Analysis of Foramen Ovale Electrode Recordings in Drug-resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients
Published on: December 18, 2016
08:23A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy
Published on: November 13, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Open and closed-loop control systems
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Feedback Loops
Epilepsy and Seizures: Overview
Various factors can trigger epilepsy, including genetic factors, brain damage, metabolic causes, and unknown etiology. Diagnosis of epilepsy involves electroencephalography (EEG), which...
Close Relationships and Culture