Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pathologist's perspective on primary rectal cancer.

Kenneth Friedman1

  • 1Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. Kenneth.Friedman@uhhospitals.org.

Abdominal Radiology (New York)
|July 22, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Pathologists critically evaluate rectal cancer specimens. Their reports guide surgical technique and patient outcomes, emphasizing complete mesorectal excision and clear margins to reduce recurrence.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inhibin-Positive "Cholangioblastic" Variant of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Report of 3 New Patients With Review of the Literature.

International journal of surgical pathologyยท2023
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal surgery
  • Surgical pathology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Pathologist evaluation of rectal cancer is crucial.
  • Surgical technique quality is influenced by pathology reports.
  • Complete mesorectal excision and resection margins impact patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the pathologist's role in optimizing rectal cancer evaluation.
  • To emphasize the importance of pathological assessment for surgical quality.
  • To address the challenge of implementing methods for improved rectal cancer analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current practices in rectal cancer specimen evaluation.
  • Analysis of data linking surgical technique to pathological findings.
  • Discussion of methods to enhance the accuracy of margin assessment.
Keywords:
Colorectal neoplasms/pathologyNeoplasm stagingRectal neoplasms/pathologyRectum/pathology

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Pathology reports significantly influence surgical technique and patient outcomes.
  • Complete mesorectal excision is critical for reducing local recurrence.
  • Accurate margin assessment is essential for improved clinical results.

Conclusions:

  • Optimizing the evaluation of primary rectal cancers is a key challenge for pathologists.
  • Pathological assessment directly impacts surgical quality and patient prognosis.
  • Further development of methods for enhanced rectal cancer analysis is warranted.