Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

8.6K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
8.6K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

3.0K
3.0K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.6K
2.6K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.2K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.2K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.5K
2.5K
Dynamics of Circular Motion01:30

Dynamics of Circular Motion

23.3K
An object undergoing circular motion, like a race car, is accelerating because it is changing the direction of its velocity. This centrally directed acceleration is called centripetal acceleration. This acceleration acts along the radius of the curved path (thus is also referred to as radial acceleration).
Any acceleration must be produced by some force. Therefore, any force or combination of forces can cause centripetal acceleration. A few examples include the tension in the rope on a...
23.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The implicit regularizing effect of stochastic resetting in deep learning analysis of anomalous diffusion.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Membrane voltage multistability in coupled glial cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Optimizing document retrieval using massive text embeddings and LLM prompt engineering.

Systematic reviews·2026
Same author

HARL-TRADE: A hierarchical adaptive reinforcement learning framework for second-level high-frequency trading.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Quantifying the temporal dynamics of environmental awareness through longitudinal social media analysis.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

AI-driven landscape values mapping.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Preparation of Liquid Crystal Networks for Macroscopic Oscillatory Motion Induced by Light
07:56

Preparation of Liquid Crystal Networks for Macroscopic Oscillatory Motion Induced by Light

Published on: September 20, 2017

12.1K

Cooperation dynamics in networked geometric Brownian motion.

Viktor Stojkoski1, Zoran Utkovski2,3, Lasko Basnarkov1,4

  • 1Academy of Sciences and Arts of the Republic of North Macedonia, P.O. Box 428, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia.

Physical Review. E
|July 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pooling and sharing enhance cooperation in fluctuating environments. Network structure significantly impacts resource distribution, affecting evolutionary advantage despite general benefits.

More Related Videos

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

10.2K
Quantification of Protein Interaction Network Dynamics using Multiplexed Co-Immunoprecipitation
07:57

Quantification of Protein Interaction Network Dynamics using Multiplexed Co-Immunoprecipitation

Published on: August 21, 2019

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Preparation of Liquid Crystal Networks for Macroscopic Oscillatory Motion Induced by Light
07:56

Preparation of Liquid Crystal Networks for Macroscopic Oscillatory Motion Induced by Light

Published on: September 20, 2017

12.1K
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

10.2K
Quantification of Protein Interaction Network Dynamics using Multiplexed Co-Immunoprecipitation
07:57

Quantification of Protein Interaction Network Dynamics using Multiplexed Co-Immunoprecipitation

Published on: August 21, 2019

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Network science
  • Econophysics

Background:

  • Pooling and sharing are proposed mechanisms for cooperation in fluctuating environments.
  • Previous models assumed well-mixed populations, neglecting real-world network structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of network topology on cooperative dynamics in fluctuating environments.
  • To model networked pooling and sharing of resources undergoing geometric Brownian motion.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a mathematical model for networked resource pooling and sharing.
  • Simulated cooperative dynamics on complex network structures.

Main Results:

  • Cooperation generally increases individual steady-state growth rates, proving evolutionarily advantageous.
  • Network structure introduces significant variations in individual resource endowments.

Conclusions:

  • Network topology plays a crucial role in the outcomes of cooperative strategies.
  • Findings have implications for understanding cooperation in biological and social systems.