Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex01:23

Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex

2.4K
The somatosensory cortex in the parietal lobes is crucial for interpreting sensory data such as touch, temperature, and proprioception. The somatosensory cortex, situated in the parietal lobes, plays a vital role in interpreting sensory information like touch, temperature, and proprioception—awareness of body position. This specialized brain region features an organized structure wherein neurons at the top primarily process sensations originating from the lower body. In contrast, those at...
2.4K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

1.5K
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
1.5K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

1.9K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
1.9K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.1K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.1K
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

11.1K
The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the...
11.1K
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion01:22

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion

564
In the context of a rigid body's movement within a general plane, it is important to understand that this motion is typically triggered by external forces or couple moments exerted onto it. This principle can be explained through Newton's second law, which stipulates the translational motion of the body's center of mass along each axis.
Moreover, the body's center of mass experiences a rotational effect as a result of these couple moments. This rotation can be articulated as the...
564

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving positively tuned voltage indicators for faster kinetics and higher contrast.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Distinct laminar origins of sensory-evoked high-gamma and low-frequency ECoG signals revealed by optogenetics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Degraded sensory coding in a mouse model of <i>Scn2a-</i>related disorder and its rescue by CRISPRa gene activation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Distinct laminar origins of high-gamma and low-frequency ECoG signals revealed by optogenetics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

The hidden cost of being uninsured: Stroke mortality after mechanical thrombectomy.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2025
Same author

Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Functional Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 7 T in the Rat Barrel Cortex During Whisker Activation
09:26

Functional Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 7 T in the Rat Barrel Cortex During Whisker Activation

Published on: February 8, 2019

9.2K

Elementary motion sequence detectors in whisker somatosensory cortex.

Keven J Laboy-Juárez1,2, Tomer Langberg1, Seoiyoung Ahn1

  • 1Deparment of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Nature Neuroscience
|July 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers discovered that neurons in the mouse somatosensory cortex (S1) detect touch sequences, not just single touches. This finding reveals how the brain processes complex tactile information, like motion direction.

More Related Videos

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation
06:56

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation

Published on: December 18, 2015

13.8K
Imaging Neural Activity in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex Using Thy1-GCaMP6s Transgenic Mice
07:04

Imaging Neural Activity in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex Using Thy1-GCaMP6s Transgenic Mice

Published on: January 7, 2019

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Functional Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 7 T in the Rat Barrel Cortex During Whisker Activation
09:26

Functional Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 7 T in the Rat Barrel Cortex During Whisker Activation

Published on: February 8, 2019

9.2K
Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation
06:56

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation

Published on: December 18, 2015

13.8K
Imaging Neural Activity in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex Using Thy1-GCaMP6s Transgenic Mice
07:04

Imaging Neural Activity in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex Using Thy1-GCaMP6s Transgenic Mice

Published on: January 7, 2019

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Somatosensory System Research
  • Tactile Sensory Processing

Background:

  • The somatosensory cortex (S1) is crucial for processing touch, but how it decodes complex tactile patterns during exploration remains unclear.
  • Existing models often assume neurons detect single-whisker features, which may not fully capture the complexity of tactile input.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the mouse whisker somatosensory cortex (S1) encodes complex tactile information, specifically focusing on the response to two-whisker stimulation.
  • To determine if S1 neurons act as single-whisker feature detectors or respond to more complex spatio-temporal patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized temporally dense stimulation of local whisker pairs in the mouse S1.
  • Analyzed neuronal responses to identify tuning properties and feature detection capabilities.

Main Results:

  • Most S1 neurons are not simple single-whisker detectors; instead, they exhibit strong tuning to specific two-whisker sequences.
  • Neurons preferentially responded to sequences involving the columnar whisker (CW) and a specific surround whisker (SW), often in a SW-leading-CW order.
  • This tuning generated a rate code for local motion vectors, with asymmetric suppression sharpening the response to preferred combinations, analogous to motion direction selectivity in vision.

Conclusions:

  • The mouse S1 encodes local motion sequences through neuronal responses to two-whisker combinations, providing a basis for higher-order tactile feature extraction.
  • Neurons with the strongest combination tuning were found in areas not predicted by the classical whisker map, suggesting a re-evaluation of S1 organization.
  • This study advances our understanding of sensory coding in the somatosensory cortex and its role in interpreting complex tactile environments.