Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.0K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.2K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

18.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
18.4K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

1.5K
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
1.5K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

1.9K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
1.9K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.1K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cattle Target Segmentation Method in Multi-Scenes Using Improved DeepLabV3+ Method.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2023
Same author

A Posture Recognition Method Based on Indoor Positioning Technology.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
Same author

Serum concentrations of antioxidant vitamins and carotenoids are low in individuals with a history of attempted suicide.

Nutritional neuroscience·2007
Same author

Arsenic trioxide induces different gene expression profiles of genes related to growth and apoptosis in glioma cells dependent on the p53 status.

Molecular biology reports·2007
Same author

Role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases in cardioprotection of morphine preconditioning.

Chinese medical journal·2007
Same author

Rapamycin inhibits osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in MC3T3-E1 cells and primary mouse bone marrow stromal cells.

Journal of cellular biochemistry·2007

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Evaluation of Microbial Safety of Dairies using Bacterial Proteomic Profiling via MALDI Approach
09:31

Evaluation of Microbial Safety of Dairies using Bacterial Proteomic Profiling via MALDI Approach

Published on: October 7, 2025

461

An Improved Single Shot Multibox Detector Method Applied in Body Condition Score for Dairy Cows.

Xiaoping Huang1,2, Zelin Hu2, Xiaorun Wang3

  • 1Institute of Intelligent Machines, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China.

Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI
|July 26, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a low-cost deep learning method for evaluating dairy cow Body Condition Scores (BCS) using 2D images. The improved model achieves high accuracy and faster detection speeds, benefiting large-scale farms.

Keywords:
body condition score (BCS)dairy cowmachine visionnon-contact sensingsing shot multi-box detector (SSD)

More Related Videos

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
04:55

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children

Published on: September 11, 2018

11.2K
Measuring Liver Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption and Proton Leak Kinetics to Estimate Mitochondrial Respiration in Holstein Dairy Cattle
08:29

Measuring Liver Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption and Proton Leak Kinetics to Estimate Mitochondrial Respiration in Holstein Dairy Cattle

Published on: November 30, 2018

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Evaluation of Microbial Safety of Dairies using Bacterial Proteomic Profiling via MALDI Approach
09:31

Evaluation of Microbial Safety of Dairies using Bacterial Proteomic Profiling via MALDI Approach

Published on: October 7, 2025

461
Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
04:55

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children

Published on: September 11, 2018

11.2K
Measuring Liver Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption and Proton Leak Kinetics to Estimate Mitochondrial Respiration in Holstein Dairy Cattle
08:29

Measuring Liver Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption and Proton Leak Kinetics to Estimate Mitochondrial Respiration in Holstein Dairy Cattle

Published on: November 30, 2018

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Animal Science
  • Computer Vision
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Body Condition Scoring (BCS) is crucial for dairy cow health and productivity.
  • Traditional BCS methods are labor-intensive and inefficient for large farms.
  • Existing computer vision methods for BCS require further accuracy improvements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a cost-effective and accurate BCS evaluation system for dairy cows.
  • To leverage deep learning and machine vision for automated BCS assessment.
  • To improve the efficiency and scalability of BCS monitoring in dairy farming.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a dataset of 8972 back-view 2D images of dairy cows captured by network cameras.
  • Manually labeled key body parts (tails, pins, rump) for training.
  • Developed an improved Single Shot Multi-box Detector (SSD) model inspired by DenseNet and Inception-v4 for tail detection and BCS evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Achieved 98.46% classification accuracy and 89.63% location accuracy.
  • Demonstrated a fast detection speed of 115 frames per second (fps).
  • The improved SSD model has a smaller size (23.1 MB) compared to original SSD and YOLO-v3, reducing hardware costs.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed deep learning-based method offers a highly accurate and efficient solution for automated BCS evaluation.
  • The system's speed, accuracy, and reduced hardware requirements make it suitable for large-scale dairy farms.
  • This approach significantly enhances the monitoring of dairy cow health and metabolic status.