Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Dural Stimulation and Periorbital von Frey Testing in Mice As a Preclinical Model of Headache
Published on: July 29, 2021
CSF Pressure, Volume, and Post-Dural Puncture Headache: A Case-Control Study and Systematic Review
Jonathan H Smith1, Brian Mac Grory2, Richard J Butterfield3
1Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) risk is not influenced by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure, closing pressure, or volume removed. High-volume CSF removal may be linked to PDPH, suggesting distinct headache subtypes.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Anesthesiology
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- The International Classification of Headache Diagnoses, 3rd Edition (ICHD-3) criteria for post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) require documentation of intracranial hypotension, a concept yet to be definitively proven.
- Current diagnostic criteria for PDPH may need revision based on emerging evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review existing literature evaluating the association between PDPH and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure (OP), closing pressure (CP), and volume removed (V).
- To conduct a case-control study investigating the pressure-volume index (PVI) as a potential novel risk factor for PDPH.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature review was performed across multiple databases (Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science).
- Studies were included if they compared headache incidence after lumbar puncture (LP) based on OP, CP, and/or V.
- A retrospective, case-control study with 1:1 matching was conducted using ICHD-3 criteria, excluding patients with factors influencing CSF pressure.
Main Results:
- The systematic review found no convincing evidence linking PDPH incidence to OP or CP.
- A minority of studies suggested an association between PDPH and V, particularly with high-volume CSF removal or when stratified by headache onset timing.
- The case-control study found no significant difference in elastance or PVI between PDPH cases and controls.
Conclusions:
- The overall risk of PDPH does not appear to be significantly influenced by OP, CP, V, or PVI.
- PDPH may be associated with V in cases of high-volume CSF removal and could depend on the timing of assessment.
- Future diagnostic criteria for PDPH should consider immediate and delayed subtypes and should not mandate intracranial hypotension.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Control Volume and System Representations
The control volume approach considers a stationary region in space through which fluid flows. This region is bounded by a control surface. For instance, in the case of water...
Le Chatelier's Principle: Changing Volume (Pressure)
Pressure and Volume in an Adiabatic Process
Linear Momentum in Control Volume
Conservation of Energy in Control Volume
For steady flow systems, the time derivative of the stored energy becomes zero since there is no energy accumulation within the control volume. This simplifies the energy equation to:
Conservation of Mass in Fixed, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the case of a sewer pipe, which can be modeled...

