Maximal contraction methods influence the magnitude and reliability of global electromyographic signal...

The purpose was two-fold: (1) to examine differences in maximal voluntary isometric torque (MVIT) production, and electromyographic signal amplitude (EMG_AMP) and mean power frequency (EMG_MPF) values obtained during traditional (MVIC_TRAD), rapid (MVIC_RAPID), and ramp (MVIC_RAMP) maximal voluntary isometric contractions, and (2) to determine if there were differences in the reliability of MVIT, EMG_AMP and EMG_MPF among the three MVIC types.

Twenty-two young males and females completed MVIC_TRAD, MVIC_RAPID, and MVIC_RAMP muscle actions on two separate visits separated by 48 h. During all MVICs, MVIT and EMG_AMP and EMG_MPF of the vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris (RF) were quantified.

MVIT was greater during MVIC_TRAD and MVIC_RAPID than during MVIT_RAMP (both p < 0.001). VL and RF EMG_AMP were greater during MVIC_RAMP than during MVIC_RAPID (p = 0.02 and 0.004). For EMG_MPF, there were no significant differences among MVIC types. Although all MVIC types generally resulted in reliable measurements of MVIT and EMG_AMP, reliability was stronger for EMG_MPF quantified during the MVIC_RAMP.

Investigators may choose MVIC type based on preference or equipment availability. However, investigators should note that MVIC_RAMP contractions will likely yield the greatest EMG_AMP values and more reliable measurements of VL and RF EMG_MPF.